| Latest Economics NCERT Notes, Solutions and Extra Q & A (Class 9th to 12th) | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9th | 10th | 11th | 12th | ||||||||||||||||
| Class 12th Chapters | ||
|---|---|---|
| Introductory Microeconomics | ||
| 1. Introduction | 2. Theory Of Consumer Behaviour | 3. Production And Costs |
| 4. The Theory Of The Firm Under Perfect Competition | 5. Market Equilibrium | |
| Introductory Macroeconomics | ||
| 1. Introduction | 2. National Income Accounting | 3. Money And Banking |
| 4. Determination Of Income And Employment | 5. Government Budget And The Economy | 6. Open Economy Macroeconomics |
Chapter 5 Government Budget And The Economy
The government budget is presented as a powerful instrument of fiscal policy, which the government uses to achieve its three main objectives: allocation of resources (providing public goods), redistribution of income, and stabilization of the economy.
The chapter breaks down the budget into its key components: revenue and capital receipts, and revenue and capital expenditures. The balance between these components determines if the budget is in surplus, balanced, or in deficit. The various measures of deficit—Revenue, Fiscal, and Primary—are explained, with the Fiscal Deficit being the most important as it represents the government's total borrowing requirement.
Crucially, changes in government spending (G) and taxes (T) have a multiplier effect on national income. An increase in government spending has a larger impact on income than an equivalent tax cut, a feature that makes fiscal policy a key tool for managing aggregate demand and stabilizing the economy against booms and recessions.
Government Budget — Meaning and Its Components
In a mixed economy, where both the private sector and the government play significant and complementary roles, the government's economic functions are primarily executed through its budget. The government budget is a comprehensive financial statement that outlines the government's estimated receipts (income) and estimated expenditures for a forthcoming financial year.
In India, this is a constitutional mandate under Article 112, which requires the government to present an 'Annual Financial Statement' to the Parliament for each financial year, running from 1 April to 31 March. The budget is not merely an accounting exercise; it is the government's primary tool for implementing its economic policies and a powerful statement of its national priorities.
The budget is structured into two main accounts to distinguish between transactions that have a short-term impact and those that affect the government's long-term financial position:
- Revenue Account (or Revenue Budget): This account deals with receipts and expenditures that are of a current or recurring nature. These transactions relate only to the current financial year and do not create any future assets or liabilities for the government.
- Capital Account (or Capital Budget): This account deals with receipts and expenditures that concern the government's assets and liabilities. These are non-recurring transactions that have a long-term impact on the government's financial standing.
Objectives of the Government Budget
The government uses its budget as the principal instrument to intervene in the economy and enhance the welfare of its people. The budget is designed to achieve several key objectives.
1. Allocation Function: Reallocation of Resources
The government budget plays a crucial role in allocating resources in the economy, particularly for the provision of goods and services that the free market mechanism fails to provide efficiently. These are known as public goods.
Public goods are fundamentally different from private goods (like food, clothes, or cars) due to two distinct characteristics:
- Non-Rivalrous in Consumption: The consumption of a public good by one individual does not reduce its availability to others. For example, when one person benefits from national defence or a street light, it does not diminish the benefit another person can receive. Multiple people can enjoy the benefits simultaneously without rivalry.
- Non-Excludable: It is technically difficult or prohibitively expensive to exclude anyone from enjoying the benefits of a public good, even if they do not pay for it. For instance, it is impossible to prevent a non-paying citizen from benefiting from national defence or clean air.
This non-excludability leads to the 'free-rider problem': individuals have an incentive to consume the good without contributing to its cost. Since private firms cannot profitably charge for public goods due to this problem, they have no incentive to produce them. The government must therefore step in to provide these goods, financing them through its budget (i.e., through taxation). It's important to distinguish between public provision (where the government finances the good) and public production (where the government itself produces the good).
2. Redistribution Function: Reducing Income and Wealth Inequalities
The market mechanism, left to itself, often results in a distribution of income and wealth that may be considered socially or ethically unfair. The government uses the budget to influence this distribution and reduce inequality. This redistribution function is carried out through both the revenue and expenditure sides of the budget:
- Through Taxes (Revenue Side): The government employs a progressive income tax system, where the tax rate increases as income increases. This places a higher burden on the wealthy and a lower burden on the poor. Indirect taxes can also be designed to be progressive by levying higher taxes on luxury goods consumed by the rich and lower or zero taxes on essential goods consumed by the poor.
- Through Transfers and Subsidies (Expenditure Side): The government uses the revenue collected to make transfer payments and provide subsidies that benefit the lower-income sections of society. This includes social security benefits (like old-age pensions), unemployment allowances, and subsidies on essential items like food, LPG, and education.
By taxing the rich and spending on the welfare of the poor, the government works to achieve a more equitable distribution of disposable income.
3. Stabilisation Function: Maintaining Economic Stability
Capitalist economies are prone to natural fluctuations in aggregate economic activity, known as business cycles (periods of boom and recession). The government uses its budget to moderate these fluctuations and maintain economic stability. This is known as the stabilisation function, implemented through counter-cyclical fiscal policy.
- During a Recession (period of deficient demand): When aggregate demand is low, leading to high unemployment and low output, the government can implement an expansionary fiscal policy. It can increase its expenditure (e.g., on infrastructure projects) or cut taxes to increase households' disposable income. Both measures boost aggregate demand, stimulate economic activity, and help reduce unemployment. This typically leads to a budget deficit.
- During a Boom (period of excess demand/inflation): When aggregate demand is too high, leading to inflationary pressures, the government can implement a contractionary fiscal policy. It can reduce its expenditure or increase taxes. Both measures curb aggregate demand and help to control inflation. This can lead to a budget surplus.
Classification of the Budget Components
The government budget is systematically organized into two main parts: receipts and expenditures. Each of these is further classified into a revenue account and a capital account, based on whether the transaction affects the government's long-term assets and liabilities.
Classification of Budget Receipts
Budget receipts refer to the estimated money that the government receives from all sources during a financial year. They are classified into two main categories.
1. Revenue Receipts
Revenue receipts are those inflows of money that neither create a corresponding liability for the government nor lead to a reduction in its assets. These are regular, recurring, and non-redeemable sources of income for the government. They are further divided into:
-
Tax Revenue: This is the primary and most important source of government revenue. Tax revenue consists of the proceeds from taxes and other duties imposed by the government.
- Direct Taxes: These are taxes whose liability and burden fall on the same person. They are levied on the income and property of individuals and firms. The taxpayer pays them directly to the government. Examples include Personal Income Tax, Corporation Tax (tax on the profits of companies), and Capital Gains Tax.
- Indirect Taxes: These are taxes whose liability to pay falls on one person, but the burden can be shifted to another. They are levied on goods and services. The most significant indirect tax in India is the Goods and Services Tax (GST). Other examples include Customs Duties (taxes on imports and exports) and Excise Duties (though most are now subsumed under GST).
-
Non-Tax Revenue: This includes all revenue receipts of the government from sources other than taxes. Major sources include:
- Interest Receipts: Interest received on loans given by the central government to state governments, union territories, or public sector enterprises.
- Dividends and Profits: Income earned from the profits of Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) and dividends from the government's investments, including the surplus transferred by the RBI.
- Fees and Other Receipts: Revenue from administrative services like fees for licenses, permits, registration, and fines.
- Grants: Cash grants-in-aid received from foreign countries and international organisations.
2. Capital Receipts
Capital receipts are those inflows of money that either create a liability for the government or cause a reduction in its financial assets. These receipts are generally non-recurring in nature.
-
Debt-Creating Capital Receipts: These are essentially the borrowings of the government. They are called "debt-creating" because they create a future liability for the government to repay the principal amount along with interest. Sources of borrowing include:
- Market borrowings (selling bonds and Treasury bills to the public and financial institutions).
- Loans from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).
- Loans from foreign governments and international bodies like the World Bank and IMF.
- Small savings schemes (like Post Office deposits and National Savings Certificates).
-
Non-Debt Creating Capital Receipts: These receipts reduce the government's assets but do not create any future repayment liability. The main sources are:
- Recovery of Loans: The repayment of loans that the central government had previously extended to state governments or other entities.
- Disinvestment Proceeds: The money raised from the government selling its shares in Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) to the private sector.
Classification of Budget Expenditure
Budget expenditure refers to the estimated spending of the government during a financial year. It is classified into two main categories.
1. Revenue Expenditure
Revenue expenditure is the expenditure that neither creates any physical or financial assets for the government nor causes a reduction in its liabilities. It is short-term in nature and is incurred for the normal functioning of government departments, the provision of various services, and to meet recurring expenses.
The main items of revenue expenditure include:
- Interest Payments: This is the single largest component of revenue expenditure and represents the interest paid on the government's past and current debt.
- Expenditure on General, Social, and Economic Services: This includes spending on defence services, salaries of government employees, pensions, health, and education.
- Subsidies: Financial assistance given by the government to producers or consumers to promote welfare (e.g., subsidies on food, fertilisers, and LPG).
- Grants: Grants given to state governments and other parties (even if some grants are used by the recipient to create assets, for the central government, it is a revenue expenditure).
2. Capital Expenditure
Capital expenditure is the expenditure that either creates a physical or financial asset for the government or causes a reduction in its financial liabilities. This type of expenditure is long-term and developmental in nature. It adds to the capital stock of the economy and enhances its future productive capacity.
The main items of capital expenditure include:
- Expenditure on the acquisition of assets like land, buildings, machinery, and equipment.
- Investment in shares of companies.
- Construction of infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and hospitals.
- Loans and advances given by the central government to state governments, PSUs, and foreign governments.
- Repayment of the principal amount of loans.
Balanced, Surplus, and Deficit Budget
Based on the relationship between the government's total estimated expenditure and its total estimated receipts, the budget can be classified into three types:
- A Balanced Budget is a situation where the government's total estimated expenditure is exactly equal to its total estimated receipts. While it suggests fiscal discipline, a balanced budget may not be suitable for a developing country that needs to make large public investments, nor is it ideal during a recession when the government needs to increase spending.
- A Surplus Budget is a situation where the government's total estimated receipts exceed its total estimated expenditure. This indicates that the government is extracting more money from the economy than it is injecting back. A surplus budget is a useful tool during periods of high inflation to reduce aggregate demand.
- A Deficit Budget is a situation where the government's total estimated expenditure exceeds its total estimated receipts. This is the most common feature of government budgets, especially in developing economies. A deficit budget is a key instrument of expansionary fiscal policy, used to stimulate economic growth and combat unemployment.
Measures of Government Deficit
When a government's spending is more than its revenue, it incurs a budget deficit. There are several ways to measure this deficit, and each measure provides different and important insights into the government's fiscal health and its implications for the economy.
1. Revenue Deficit
The revenue deficit focuses exclusively on the revenue account of the budget. It is the excess of the government's revenue expenditure over its revenue receipts.
Revenue Deficit = Revenue Expenditure – Revenue Receipts
Implications of a Revenue Deficit:
- It signifies that the government's own current revenue is insufficient to cover the expenses of its normal day-to-day functioning and services.
- It indicates that the government is dissaving, meaning it is using the savings of other sectors of the economy (like households and firms) to finance its consumption expenditure.
- To cover this deficit, the government has to resort to borrowing. This means the government is borrowing not for productive investment, but to pay for its recurring consumption needs.
- This leads to an accumulation of debt and a growing burden of future interest payments, which in turn increases future revenue expenditure, potentially creating a vicious cycle. To manage this, the government may be forced to cut productive capital expenditure or essential welfare spending, which can harm long-term growth and social welfare.
2. Fiscal Deficit
The fiscal deficit is the most comprehensive measure of a government's fiscal imbalance. It is defined as the difference between the government's total expenditure and its total receipts, excluding borrowings.
Gross Fiscal Deficit = Total Expenditure – (Revenue Receipts + Non-debt Creating Capital Receipts)
(Non-debt creating capital receipts are items like the recovery of loans and disinvestment proceeds).
Implications of a Fiscal Deficit:
- The most crucial implication is that the fiscal deficit is exactly equal to the total borrowing requirement of the government from all sources—be it borrowing from the domestic public (through bonds), from the central bank (RBI), or from abroad.
- Debt Trap: A high fiscal deficit leads to a large amount of borrowing. This increases the government's total debt stock, which in turn leads to higher interest payments in the future. These higher interest payments increase revenue expenditure, which can lead to a larger fiscal deficit in subsequent years, creating a potential debt trap.
- Inflation: To finance its deficit, the government might borrow from the central bank (RBI). The RBI may print new currency for this purpose, which increases the money supply in the economy and can lead to inflationary pressures.
- Crowding Out: When the government borrows heavily from the domestic market, it absorbs a large share of the economy's savings. This reduces the pool of savings available for private businesses, potentially driving up interest rates and "crowding out" private investment.
3. Primary Deficit
The fiscal deficit includes the amount of money the government needs to borrow to cover its interest payments on previously accumulated debt. The primary deficit is a measure that isolates the deficit of the current year's fiscal operations, excluding these past obligations. It is calculated by subtracting net interest liabilities from the gross fiscal deficit.
Gross Primary Deficit = Gross Fiscal Deficit – Net Interest Liabilities
Implications of the Primary Deficit:
- It indicates the borrowing requirement of the government to finance its current expenditures, excluding interest payments.
- A low or zero primary deficit is a sign of good fiscal health. It suggests that while the overall fiscal deficit might be high due to a large burden of past debt, the government's current revenue and expenditure policies are sustainable. A rising primary deficit, on the other hand, indicates a deterioration in the current fiscal stance.
Fiscal Policy and its Impact
What is Fiscal Policy?
Fiscal policy is the primary tool through which a government influences the macroeconomy. It refers to the deliberate use of government's spending and revenue-raising activities—namely, government expenditure (G) and taxes (T)—to achieve its macroeconomic objectives. As conceptualized by Keynes, the main purpose of fiscal policy is to stabilize the level of output, income, and employment by managing the level of aggregate demand in the economy.
Fiscal policy can be of two types, depending on the state of the economy:
- Expansionary Fiscal Policy: This policy is implemented to combat a recession, high unemployment, or a situation of deficient demand. The government aims to increase aggregate demand by either increasing its expenditure (G) or cutting taxes (T). An increase in G is a direct injection of spending into the economy, while a tax cut increases households' disposable income, thereby stimulating consumption (C). This policy typically results in a budget deficit.
- Contractionary Fiscal Policy: This policy is used to combat high inflation, which is caused by excess demand. The government aims to reduce aggregate demand by either decreasing its expenditure (G) or increasing taxes (T). Both measures reduce the overall level of spending in the economy, helping to control price rises. This policy can lead to a budget surplus.
The Government Expenditure and Tax Multipliers
Just like private investment, changes in government spending and taxes have a magnified or multiplier effect on the equilibrium level of national income. This is because they alter the circular flow of income, setting off a chain reaction of spending and income generation.
Changes in Government Expenditure and the Government Expenditure Multiplier
An increase in government purchases (G) represents a direct, autonomous injection of spending into the economy. This initial expenditure immediately becomes income for households and firms. This new income is then partly consumed, creating a second round of income, and so on. This leads to a final increase in equilibrium income that is much larger than the initial increase in G.
The government expenditure multiplier is the ratio of the change in equilibrium income to the change in government spending. Its formula is identical to the investment multiplier:
$ \text{Government Expenditure Multiplier} = \frac{\Delta Y}{\Delta G} = \frac{1}{1 - MPC} = \frac{1}{MPS} $
This is because a change in G, like a change in I, is a direct change in autonomous aggregate demand.
Changes in Taxes and the Tax Multiplier
The effect of a change in taxes is more indirect. A tax cut ($\Delta T$ is negative) does not directly increase aggregate demand. Instead, it first increases households' disposable income ($Y_d = Y - T$). Households will then spend only a fraction of this additional disposable income, as determined by their MPC. The initial increase in consumption, and thus the initial injection into the circular flow, is only $MPC \times (-\Delta T)$.
Because the initial impact on spending is smaller, the tax multiplier is weaker than the government expenditure multiplier. The formula for the tax multiplier is:
$ \text{Tax Multiplier} = \frac{\Delta Y}{\Delta T} = \frac{-MPC}{1 - MPC} = \frac{-MPC}{MPS} $
The tax multiplier is negative (because a tax increase reduces income, and a tax cut increases it) and is always smaller in absolute value than the government expenditure multiplier.
The Balanced Budget Multiplier
This concept addresses the question: What happens to national income if the government increases its spending (G) and finances it by an equal increase in taxes (T), such that the budget remains balanced ($\Delta G = \Delta T$)?
Intuitively, one might think the net effect is zero. However, because the government expenditure multiplier is stronger than the tax multiplier, there is a net positive effect on income. The balanced budget multiplier is always equal to 1.
This means that if government spending and taxes are both increased by ₹100 crore, the equilibrium national income will also rise by exactly ₹100 crore. The initial injection of ₹100 crore from G is more powerful than the initial withdrawal of spending caused by the ₹100 crore tax hike (which is only $MPC \times 100$).
Automatic Stabilisers and Proportional Taxes
Some elements of the fiscal system are designed to automatically cushion the economy from the shocks of the business cycle without any new, discretionary policy action by the government. These are known as automatic stabilisers.
Case of Proportional Taxes
A key example is a proportional income tax system, where the government collects a fixed fraction, $t$, of income in the form of taxes (i.e., $T = tY$). This system has an inherent stabilizing property:
- During an economic boom: As national income (Y) rises, tax revenues ($tY$) automatically increase. This siphons off a portion of the rising income, which dampens the increase in disposable income and, consequently, slows down the growth in consumption spending. This acts as an automatic brake, helping to prevent the economy from overheating and controlling inflation.
- During a recession: As national income (Y) falls, tax revenues automatically decrease. This cushions the fall in households' disposable income, preventing consumption spending from dropping as sharply as it otherwise would have. This acts as an automatic shock absorber, preventing a deeper recession.
A proportional tax system makes the economy less volatile by reducing the size of the multiplier. The new multiplier in an economy with a proportional tax is given by: $ k = \frac{1}{1 - c(1-t)} $, which is smaller than the multiplier with lump-sum taxes ($1/(1-c)$).
Other automatic stabilisers include welfare transfers like unemployment benefits, which automatically increase during a recession (supporting demand) and decrease during a boom.
Government Debt
When a government runs a budget deficit, its total expenditure exceeds its non-borrowed receipts. This shortfall must be financed. While governments can, in theory, print money to cover the gap, the more common method is to borrow. Continuous borrowing over many years leads to the accumulation of government debt, which is the total outstanding amount that the government owes to its lenders.
It is crucial to distinguish between deficits and debt. A budget deficit is a flow concept, measured as the shortfall per year. Government debt is a stock concept, representing the total accumulated borrowings at a specific point in time. Each year's deficit adds to the total stock of debt.
Is Government Debt a Burden? Perspectives on the Issue
The question of whether government debt is a burden on the economy, particularly on future generations, is a central and contentious topic in macroeconomics. There are several competing perspectives on this issue.
Arguments that Debt IS a Burden
- Intergenerational Burden: The most common argument is that by borrowing today, the government is essentially shifting the tax burden to future generations. The government issues bonds to the current generation, but the principal and accumulated interest on these bonds will have to be paid off years later by raising taxes on the next generation of workers and taxpayers. This reduces their future disposable income and consumption, thereby placing a burden on them.
- Crowding Out of Private Investment: When the government borrows heavily from the public by selling bonds, it competes with private corporations and individuals for the limited pool of national savings. This increased demand for loanable funds can drive up interest rates. Higher interest rates make it more expensive for private firms to borrow money for investment in new machinery, factories, and technology. As a result, government borrowing can "crowd out" private investment. This leads to a smaller private capital stock for future generations, potentially resulting in slower long-run economic growth.
Counterarguments (Why Debt May NOT be a Burden)
- Ricardian Equivalence: This sophisticated counterargument, named after the 19th-century economist David Ricardo, suggests that government debt is not a burden. It posits that rational, forward-looking consumers understand that government borrowing today is simply a deferred tax. They anticipate that they or their children will have to pay higher taxes in the future to repay the debt. In response, they will increase their personal savings today to be able to meet this future tax liability. This increase in private saving exactly offsets the government's dissaving (borrowing). As a result, national savings do not fall, interest rates do not rise, and private investment is not crowded out. In this view, financing government spending through debt is "equivalent" to financing it through taxes.
- Internal Debt ("We Owe it to Ourselves"): For debt that is held domestically (owed by the government to its own citizens), the interest payments are merely a transfer of resources from one group of citizens (the taxpayers) to another group (the bondholders). While it is a redistribution of income within the country, it does not represent a net reduction in the nation's overall purchasing power or resources. This argument does not hold for external debt, which is owed to foreigners. Repaying external debt involves a transfer of real goods and services (purchasing power) out of the country, which is a genuine burden.
- Public Investment: The "burden" of debt depends heavily on how the borrowed funds are used. If the government uses the debt to finance productive public investments in infrastructure (roads, ports), education, public health, or research and development, it can significantly increase the economy's long-run productive capacity. If the return on these public investments is greater than the interest rate on the debt, future generations will inherit a more productive and wealthier economy, which will more than compensate them for the higher tax liability.
- Deficits during Recessions: In a Keynesian framework, this is a crucial counterargument. If an economy is in a recession with unutilized resources (high unemployment), a deficit-financed increase in government spending can boost aggregate demand and raise the level of national income and output through the multiplier effect. A higher GDP leads to higher total income and, consequently, higher total savings. In this case, the deficit helps to generate the very savings needed to finance it, and both the government and the private sector can borrow more without necessarily "crowding out" each other.
Other Perspectives on Deficits and Debt
- Inflationary Impact: A major concern with deficits is that they can be inflationary. When the government increases spending or cuts taxes, it boosts aggregate demand. If the economy is already operating at or near its full capacity, firms will be unable to increase production to meet this higher demand. The result is "too much money chasing too few goods," which leads to a rise in the general price level (inflation). However, as noted above, if there are significant unutilized resources, the deficit may lead to higher output rather than higher prices.
- Financing Method Matters: The inflationary impact also depends on how the deficit is financed. If the government borrows from the central bank (RBI), which then prints new money to finance the loan, it directly increases the money supply and is highly likely to be inflationary. If the government borrows from the public, the inflationary impact is generally less severe.
Deficit Reduction
Concern over the long-term consequences of high debt often leads to calls for deficit reduction. A government can reduce its deficit through two main channels:
-
Increasing Revenue:
- Taxation: The government can increase tax revenue by raising tax rates or widening the tax base. In India, there has been an effort to increase reliance on direct taxes (like income and corporate tax), which are generally progressive, rather than on indirect taxes, which can be regressive.
- Non-Tax Revenue: The government can also raise receipts through the sale of shares in Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs), a process known as disinvestment.
-
Reducing Expenditure:
This is often the main focus of deficit reduction efforts. It can be achieved by:
- Making government activities and programmes more efficient through better planning and administration to reduce wastage. For example, replacing inefficient subsidies with direct cash transfers.
- Changing the scope of government by withdrawing from certain economic activities and leaving them to the private sector.
However, cutting government expenditure is challenging. A large portion of it is "committed expenditure" (like interest payments, salaries, and pensions) that is difficult to reduce. Furthermore, cutting back on crucial spending in areas like education, health, and poverty alleviation can have adverse long-term effects on economic growth and social welfare.
Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003 (FRBMA)
Rationale for the FRBMA
In a multi-party parliamentary system like India's, there is often a tendency for governments to be influenced by electoral concerns, which can lead to populist expenditure policies and a lack of long-term fiscal discipline. To address this, it was argued that a legislative provision, binding on all present and future governments, was needed to keep deficits under control.
The enactment of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act (FRBMA) in August 2003 marked a turning point in India's fiscal reforms. The Act provided an institutional framework to compel the government to pursue a prudent fiscal policy.
The core objectives of the FRBMA are to:
- Ensure inter-generational equity in fiscal management.
- Maintain long-term macro-economic stability.
- Achieve a sufficient revenue surplus over time.
- Remove fiscal obstacles to the effective conduct of monetary policy.
- Ensure effective debt management by placing limits on deficits and government borrowing.
Main Features of the Act
- Deficit Reduction Targets: The Act originally mandated the central government to reduce the fiscal deficit to not more than 3% of GDP and to completely eliminate the revenue deficit by March 31, 2009 (this deadline has since been revised multiple times).
- Annual Reduction Path: It required a minimum annual reduction in the fiscal deficit by 0.3% of GDP and in the revenue deficit by 0.5% of GDP.
- Escape Clause: The specified targets could be exceeded only on exceptional grounds, such as a threat to national security or a natural calamity.
- Restriction on Borrowing from RBI: The Act prohibited the central government from borrowing directly from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), except through 'ways and means advances' to meet temporary cash flow mismatches. This was a crucial step to stop the automatic monetization of deficits.
- Prohibition on Primary Market Subscription: It mandated that from 2006-07 onwards, the RBI must not subscribe to the primary issues of central government securities. This forces the government to raise its borrowings from the open market.
- Enhanced Transparency: The Act mandated measures to ensure greater transparency in fiscal operations.
-
Mandatory Parliamentary Statements: It requires the central government to lay three key policy statements before both Houses of Parliament along with the Annual Budget:
- The Medium-term Fiscal Policy Statement: Sets three-year rolling targets for fiscal indicators.
- The Fiscal Policy Strategy Statement: Outlines the government's fiscal priorities.
- The Macroeconomic Framework Statement: Assesses the prospects of the economy.
Evolution and Review
While the FRBMA was seen as a landmark legislation, the rigid targets have been subject to review and revision over the years, especially in the wake of economic shocks like the 2008 global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. An FRBM Review Committee was later set up to revamp the framework to incorporate the changing economic scenario in India and to provide a more flexible and realistic path for fiscal consolidation. Despite these changes, the core principle of a rule-based fiscal policy remains a key feature of India's macroeconomic management.
Goods and Services Tax (GST)
Concept: One Nation, One Tax, One Market
The Goods and Services Tax (GST), implemented on July 1, 2017, is the biggest and most significant indirect tax reform in India since independence. It is a single, comprehensive tax levied on the supply of goods and services, right from the manufacturer to the final consumer.
GST is a destination-based consumption tax, which means the tax revenue accrues to the state where the goods or services are finally consumed, rather than the state where they are produced.
Problems with the Pre-GST Tax Regime
The previous indirect tax system was highly fragmented and complex. It suffered from a major flaw known as the cascading of taxes or "tax on tax."
Previously, taxes (like Central Excise Duty and State VAT) were levied at each stage of production on the total value of the commodity, which included taxes paid at the previous stages. The facility to claim credit for taxes paid on inputs (Input Tax Credit) was very limited. This led to a cascading effect, which increased the cost of production and the final price paid by the consumer.
How GST Works: The Value Added Principle and ITC
GST is designed to eliminate the cascading effect. It is effectively a tax on the value addition at each stage of the supply chain. This is achieved through the mechanism of Input Tax Credit (ITC).
- Under GST, tax is levied at every stage of supply (from manufacturer to wholesaler to retailer).
- However, at each stage, the seller can claim a credit for the GST they have already paid on their inputs (raw materials and services).
- This means they only have to pay tax on the value they have added to the product at their stage.
Example: If a retailer buys a good for ₹100 + ₹18 GST (total ₹118) and sells it for ₹150, their output tax liability would be 18% of ₹150 = ₹27. However, they can claim an ITC of ₹18 that they already paid. So, their net tax payment to the government is only ₹27 - ₹18 = ₹9, which is 18% of the value they added (₹50).
Taxes Subsumed by GST
GST has replaced a large number of Central and State indirect taxes.
- Major Central Taxes Subsumed: Central Excise Duty, Service Tax, Central Sales Tax, and various cesses.
- Major State Taxes Subsumed: Value Added Tax (VAT)/Sales Tax, Entry Tax, Luxury Tax, Octroi, Entertainment Tax, and taxes on lottery and betting.
GST Rates and Exclusions
- GST Rates: There are six standard rates applied across the country: 0%, 3% (for gold), 5%, 12%, 18%, and 28%.
- Exclusions: For the time being, five petroleum products (crude oil, petrol, diesel, ATF, natural gas) and alcoholic liquor for human consumption have been kept out of the GST ambit.
Aims and Benefits of GST
- It has simplified the multiplicity of indirect taxes into a single tax system.
- It has standardized tax laws, procedures, and rates across the country, creating a common national market.
- It has eliminated the cascading effect of taxes, reducing the cost of production.
- It aims to make Indian goods and services more competitive in domestic and international markets.
- It is expected to boost economic growth and GDP.
- It has improved tax compliance and transparency through a common online portal (the GST Network - GSTN).
- It has expanded the tax base and is furthering the ease of doing business in India.
NCERT Questions Solution
Question 1. Explain why public goods must be provided by the government.
Answer:
Public goods, such as national defence, roads, and public parks, must be provided by the government because the private sector, guided by the market mechanism, has no incentive to supply them. This failure of the market arises from two unique characteristics of public goods:
1. Non-Rivalrous Consumption:
The consumption of a public good by one person does not reduce its availability to others. For example, one person benefiting from a street light does not prevent another person from also benefiting. This means the marginal cost of providing the good to an additional user is zero, making it inefficient for a private company to charge for it.
2. Non-Excludable:
It is impossible or prohibitively expensive to exclude non-payers from enjoying the benefits of a public good. For instance, it is not feasible to prevent a citizen from benefiting from national defence, even if they do not pay for it. This leads to the 'free-rider problem', where individuals will wait for others to pay for the good and then consume it for free.
Because of the free-rider problem, a private firm cannot generate revenue by producing public goods. As there is no profit motive, the private sector will not provide them. Therefore, the government must step in, provide these goods for the collective welfare of society, and finance them through compulsory payments like taxes.
Question 2. Distinguish between revenue expenditure and capital expenditure.
Answer:
The distinction between revenue expenditure and capital expenditure is based on whether the spending creates assets or reduces liabilities for the government.
Revenue Expenditure:
This is expenditure that neither creates any assets nor reduces any liability for the government. It is short-term, recurring in nature, and is incurred for the normal functioning of government departments and the provision of various services. Examples include salaries, pensions, subsidies, and interest payments on government debt.
Capital Expenditure:
This is expenditure that either creates a physical or financial asset or causes a reduction in a liability for the government. It is long-term, developmental, and non-recurring in nature. Examples include the construction of roads and hospitals, purchase of machinery, investment in shares, and repayment of the principal amount of loans.
Question 3. ‘The fiscal deficit gives the borrowing requirement of the government’. Elucidate.
Answer:
The statement is correct. The fiscal deficit is the primary indicator of the government's borrowing requirement.
Elucidation:
Fiscal deficit is defined as the excess of the government's total expenditure over its total receipts, excluding borrowings. The formula is:
Fiscal Deficit = Total Expenditure – (Revenue Receipts + Non-debt Creating Capital Receipts)
This formula essentially calculates the gap between the government's total spending and its total income from non-borrowed sources. Since this gap represents the amount of expenditure that is not covered by its own receipts, the only way to finance this shortfall is through borrowing.
Therefore, the calculated value of the fiscal deficit is precisely equal to the total amount of money the government needs to borrow from all sources, including the domestic market, the Reserve Bank of India, and foreign countries.
Question 4. Give the relationship between the revenue deficit and the fiscal deficit.
Answer:
The revenue deficit is a component of the fiscal deficit. The relationship can be derived as follows:
Fiscal Deficit = Total Expenditure – (Revenue Receipts + Non-debt creating Capital Receipts)
We know that Total Expenditure = Revenue Expenditure + Capital Expenditure.
Substituting this into the fiscal deficit formula:
Fiscal Deficit = (Revenue Expenditure + Capital Expenditure) – Revenue Receipts – Non-debt creating Capital Receipts
Rearranging the terms:
Fiscal Deficit = (Revenue Expenditure – Revenue Receipts) + (Capital Expenditure – Non-debt creating Capital Receipts)
Since (Revenue Expenditure – Revenue Receipts) is the Revenue Deficit, the final relationship is:
Fiscal Deficit = Revenue Deficit + (Capital Expenditure – Non-debt creating Capital Receipts)
This shows that a part of the fiscal deficit is the revenue deficit. A high revenue deficit component indicates that a large portion of the government's borrowing is being used to finance its consumption expenditure rather than for productive investment.
Question 5. Suppose that for a particular economy, investment is equal to 200, government purchases are 150, net taxes (that is lump-sum taxes minus transfers) is 100 and consumption is given by $C = 100 + 0.75Y_D$ where $Y_D$ is disposable income.
(a) What is the level of equilibrium income?
(b) Calculate the value of the government expenditure multiplier and the tax multiplier.
(c) If government expenditure increases by 200, find the change in equilibrium income.
Answer:
Given:
- I = 200
- G = 150
- Net Taxes (T) = 100
- Consumption (C) = 100 + 0.75$Y_D$
- MPC (c) = 0.75
(a) What is the level of equilibrium income?
Disposable income ($Y_D$) = Y - T = Y - 100.
So, the consumption function is $C = 100 + 0.75(Y - 100)$.
The equilibrium condition is Y = C + I + G.
$Y = [100 + 0.75(Y - 100)] + 200 + 150$
$Y = 100 + 0.75Y - 75 + 350$
$Y = 375 + 0.75Y$
$Y - 0.75Y = 375$
$0.25Y = 375$
$Y = 375 / 0.25 = 1500$
The equilibrium level of income is 1500.
(b) Calculate the value of the government expenditure multiplier and the tax multiplier.
Government Expenditure Multiplier = $\frac{1}{1-c} = \frac{1}{1 - 0.75} = \frac{1}{0.25} = 4$.
Tax Multiplier = $\frac{-c}{1-c} = \frac{-0.75}{1 - 0.75} = \frac{-0.75}{0.25} = -3$.
The multipliers are 4 and -3 respectively.
(c) If government expenditure increases by 200, find the change in equilibrium income.
Change in Income ($\Delta Y$) = Government Expenditure Multiplier $\times$ Change in G ($\Delta G$)
$\Delta Y = 4 \times 200 = 800$
The change in equilibrium income is an increase of 800.
Question 6. Consider an economy described by the following functions: $C = 20 + 0.80Y_D$, $I = 30$, $G = 50$, $TR = 100$ (where $Y_D$ is disposable income and there are no taxes).
(a) Find the equilibrium level of income and the autonomous expenditure multiplier in the model.
(b) If government expenditure increases by 30, what is the impact on equilibrium income?
(c) If a lump-sum tax of 30 is added to pay for the increase in government purchases, how will equilibrium income change?
Answer:
Given:
- C = 20 + 0.80$Y_D$
- I = 30
- G = 50
- Transfers (TR) = 100
- Taxes (T) = 0
- MPC (c) = 0.80
(a) Find the equilibrium level of income and the autonomous expenditure multiplier.
Disposable Income ($Y_D$) = Y - T + TR = Y - 0 + 100 = Y + 100.
Consumption function: C = 20 + 0.80(Y + 100) = 20 + 0.8Y + 80 = 100 + 0.8Y.
Equilibrium condition: Y = C + I + G
$Y = (100 + 0.8Y) + 30 + 50$
$Y = 180 + 0.8Y$
$0.2Y = 180$
$Y = 180 / 0.2 = 900$
The equilibrium level of income is 900.
Autonomous Expenditure Multiplier = $\frac{1}{1-c} = \frac{1}{1 - 0.8} = \frac{1}{0.2} = 5$.
(b) If government expenditure increases by 30, what is the impact on equilibrium income?
Impact ($\Delta Y$) = Multiplier $\times$ $\Delta G = 5 \times 30 = 150$.
The equilibrium income will increase by 150.
(c) If a lump-sum tax of 30 is added to pay for the increase in government purchases, how will equilibrium income change?
This is a balanced budget change ($\Delta G = 30$ and $\Delta T = 30$). The balanced budget multiplier is always 1.
Change in Income ($\Delta Y$) = Balanced Budget Multiplier $\times$ $\Delta G = 1 \times 30 = 30$.
The equilibrium income will increase by 30.
Question 7. In the above question, calculate the effect on output of a 10 per cent increase in transfers, and a 10 per cent increase in lump-sum taxes. Compare the effects of the two.
Answer:
Initial values from Q6: c = 0.8, TR = 100. There were no initial taxes.
Effect of a 10% increase in transfers:
Change in Transfers ($\Delta TR$) = 10% of 100 = 10.
Transfer Multiplier = $\frac{c}{1-c} = \frac{0.8}{1 - 0.8} = \frac{0.8}{0.2} = 4$.
Change in Output ($\Delta Y$) = Transfer Multiplier $\times$ $\Delta TR = 4 \times 10 = 40$.
A 10% increase in transfers will increase output by 40.
Effect of a 10% increase in lump-sum taxes:
Since initial taxes were 0, a 10% increase is not well-defined. Let's assume it means a new lump-sum tax of 10 (equal to the increase in transfers).
Change in Taxes ($\Delta T$) = 10.
Tax Multiplier = $\frac{-c}{1-c} = \frac{-0.8}{1 - 0.8} = \frac{-0.8}{0.2} = -4$.
Change in Output ($\Delta Y$) = Tax Multiplier $\times$ $\Delta T = -4 \times 10 = -40$.
A 10% increase in taxes will decrease output by 40.
Comparison:
An equal increase in transfers and lump-sum taxes has an equal and opposite effect on the equilibrium output. The increase in transfers raises income, while the increase in taxes lowers it by the same absolute amount.
Question 8. We suppose that $C = 70 + 0.70Y D$, $I = 90$, $G = 100$, $T = 0.10Y$
(a) Find the equilibrium income.
(b) What are tax revenues at equilibrium income? Does the government have a balanced budget?
Answer:
Given:
- C = 70 + 0.70$Y_D$
- I = 90
- G = 100
- Tax Rate (t) = 0.10, so T = 0.10Y
(a) Find the equilibrium income.
Disposable Income ($Y_D$) = Y - T = Y - 0.10Y = 0.90Y.
Consumption function: C = 70 + 0.70(0.90Y) = 70 + 0.63Y.
Equilibrium condition: Y = C + I + G
$Y = (70 + 0.63Y) + 90 + 100$
$Y = 260 + 0.63Y$
$Y - 0.63Y = 260$
$0.37Y = 260$
$Y = 260 / 0.37 \approx 702.7$
The equilibrium income is approximately 702.7.
(b) What are tax revenues at equilibrium income? Does the government have a balanced budget?
Tax Revenue (T) = 0.10 $\times$ Y = 0.10 $\times$ 702.7 = 70.27.
Government Expenditure (G) = 100.
Budget Balance = Tax Revenue - Government Expenditure = 70.27 - 100 = -29.73.
The tax revenues are 70.27. Since expenditure (100) is greater than revenue (70.27), the government does not have a balanced budget; it has a budget deficit.
Question 9. Suppose marginal propensity to consume is 0.75 and there is a 20 per cent proportional income tax. Find the change in equilibrium income for the following
(a) Government purchases increase by 20
(b) Transfers decrease by 20.
Answer:
Given:
- Marginal Propensity to Consume (c) = 0.75
- Proportional Income Tax Rate (t) = 20% = 0.20
First, we need to calculate the value of the multiplier for an economy with proportional taxes. The formula is:
$ \text{Multiplier (k)} = \frac{1}{1 - c(1-t)} $
$ k = \frac{1}{1 - 0.75(1 - 0.20)} = \frac{1}{1 - 0.75(0.80)} = \frac{1}{1 - 0.60} = \frac{1}{0.40} = 2.5 $
(a) Government purchases increase by 20:
The change in equilibrium income ($\Delta Y$) is calculated by multiplying the change in government purchases ($\Delta G$) by the multiplier.
$\Delta Y = k \times \Delta G$
$\Delta Y = 2.5 \times 20 = 50$
The equilibrium income will increase by 50.
(b) Transfers decrease by 20:
A change in transfers ($\Delta TR$) first affects consumption by $c \times \Delta TR$. This initial change in spending then gets magnified by the multiplier.
Initial change in spending = $c \times \Delta TR = 0.75 \times (-20) = -15$.
Total change in equilibrium income ($\Delta Y$) = Multiplier $\times$ Initial change in spending
$\Delta Y = 2.5 \times (-15) = -37.5$
The equilibrium income will decrease by 37.5.
Question 10. Explain why the tax multiplier is smaller in absolute value than the government expenditure multiplier.
Answer:
The tax multiplier is smaller in absolute value than the government expenditure multiplier because a change in government spending has a more direct impact on aggregate demand than a change in taxes.
Government Expenditure Multiplier: An increase in government expenditure (G) is a direct injection of spending into the economy. If G increases by Rs 100, aggregate demand increases by the full Rs 100 in the first round. This entire amount then enters the multiplier process.
Tax Multiplier: A decrease in taxes (T) does not directly increase spending. It first increases households' disposable income. Households then spend only a fraction of this extra income, as determined by their Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC). For example, if taxes are cut by Rs 100 and the MPC is 0.8, the initial increase in consumption spending is only Rs 80 ($0.8 \times 100$). Only this smaller amount of Rs 80 enters the multiplier process.
Since the initial injection into the circular flow of income is smaller for a tax cut than for an equal increase in government spending, the final magnified effect on equilibrium income is also smaller.
Question 11. Explain the relation between government deficit and government debt.
Answer:
The relationship between government deficit and government debt is that of a flow to a stock.
Government Deficit: This is a flow concept. It represents the shortfall of the government's total receipts compared to its total expenditure over a specific period, usually a financial year. To cover this shortfall, the government must borrow.
Government Debt: This is a stock concept. It represents the total accumulated amount of borrowings by the government over many years that has not yet been repaid. It is the total outstanding liability of the government at a particular point in time.
The relation is that the deficit in any given year adds to the total stock of debt. For example, if the government had an existing debt of Rs 1000 crore and runs a deficit of Rs 200 crore this year, its total debt at the end of the year will be Rs 1200 crore. Thus, deficits are the annual additions to the total government debt.
Question 12. Does public debt impose a burden? Explain.
Answer:
Whether public debt imposes a burden is a complex issue with several perspectives.
Arguments that Debt IS a Burden:
- Burden on Future Generations: It is argued that by borrowing today, the government shifts the burden of repayment to future generations. Future taxpayers will have to pay higher taxes to repay the debt and interest, which reduces their disposable income and consumption.
- Crowding Out Private Investment: When the government borrows heavily, it competes for the limited pool of savings in the economy. This can drive up interest rates, making it more expensive for private firms to borrow and invest. This "crowding out" of private investment can lead to a smaller capital stock and slower economic growth in the future.
Counterarguments that Debt may NOT be a Burden:
- Internal Debt ("We owe it to ourselves"): If the debt is held domestically, the interest payments are simply a transfer from one group (taxpayers) to another (bondholders) within the same country. There is no net loss of purchasing power for the nation as a whole. This argument does not apply to external debt owed to foreigners.
- Productive Use of Borrowed Funds: If the government uses the borrowed money for productive public investments like building infrastructure, schools, and hospitals, it can increase the economy's future productive capacity. If the return on these investments is higher than the interest rate on the debt, future generations may be better off.
- Ricardian Equivalence: This theory suggests that forward-looking consumers understand that government borrowing today implies higher taxes in the future. They will increase their savings now to prepare for this, offsetting the government's borrowing. In this view, national savings do not fall, and investment is not crowded out.
Question 13. Are fiscal deficits inflationary?
Answer:
Fiscal deficits are not always inflationary. The inflationary impact of a fiscal deficit depends on the state of the economy.
When deficits CAN be inflationary:
If the economy is already operating at or near its full employment level, it means there are very few unutilised resources. In this situation, if the government runs a deficit (by increasing spending or cutting taxes), it will increase aggregate demand. Since firms cannot easily increase production, this excess demand will lead to a rise in the general price level, causing inflation. This is especially true if the deficit is financed by the central bank printing new money.
When deficits may NOT be inflationary:
If the economy is in a recession and there are significant unutilised resources (like high unemployment and idle factories), a fiscal deficit that increases aggregate demand will prompt firms to increase their output and hire more workers. In this Keynesian scenario, the deficit leads to an increase in real output and employment rather than an increase in prices.
Question 14. Discuss the issue of deficit reduction.
Answer:
Deficit reduction involves policies aimed at lowering the government's budget deficit. This can be achieved through two primary channels:
1. Increasing Government Revenue:
- Taxation: The government can raise tax revenue by increasing existing tax rates or by widening the tax base to include more people and activities. In India, the focus has been on improving compliance and increasing reliance on direct taxes.
- Non-Tax Revenue: Revenue can be increased through measures like the sale of shares in Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs), a process known as disinvestment.
2. Reducing Government Expenditure:
This is often the main focus of deficit reduction efforts. It can involve:
- Improving Efficiency: Making government programmes and administration more efficient to reduce wastage. For instance, replacing poorly targeted subsidies with direct cash transfers.
- Changing the Scope of Government: The government can withdraw from certain areas and allow the private sector to play a larger role.
Challenges in Deficit Reduction:
Reducing expenditure is difficult because a large part of it is committed (e.g., interest payments, salaries, pensions). Furthermore, cutting spending in crucial areas like health, education, and poverty alleviation can have severe negative consequences for social welfare and long-term economic growth.
Question 15. What do you understand by G.S.T? How good is the system of G.S.T as compared to the old tax system? State its categories.
Answer:
What is G.S.T?
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a single, comprehensive, destination-based indirect tax levied on the supply of goods and services across India. It replaced a multitude of Central and State taxes, creating the principle of 'One Nation, One Tax, One Market'.
How is G.S.T better than the old tax system?
The GST system is a significant improvement over the old tax system primarily because it eliminates the cascading effect of taxes (or 'tax on tax').
- In the old system, taxes were levied at each stage on the total value of the product, which included taxes paid at previous stages.
- Under GST, tax is levied only on the value addition at each stage. This is achieved through a seamless system of Input Tax Credit (ITC), where a producer can claim credit for the taxes already paid on their inputs. This reduces the cost of production and the final price for the consumer.
Other benefits include a simplified tax structure, increased transparency, and the creation of a common national market.
Categories of G.S.T:
GST is structured with a dual model to accommodate the fiscal requirements of both the Centre and the States:
- CGST (Central GST): Levied by the Central Government on intra-state supplies of goods and services.
- SGST (State GST): Levied by the State Governments on intra-state supplies of goods and services.
- UTGST (Union Territory GST): Levied by Union Territory Governments on intra-state supplies.
- IGST (Integrated GST): Levied by the Central Government on inter-state supplies of goods and services.