| Non-Rationalised Science NCERT Notes and Solutions (Class 6th to 10th) | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6th | 7th | 8th | 9th | 10th | ||||||||||
| Non-Rationalised Science NCERT Notes and Solutions (Class 11th) | ||||||||||||||
| Physics | Chemistry | Biology | ||||||||||||
| Non-Rationalised Science NCERT Notes and Solutions (Class 12th) | ||||||||||||||
| Physics | Chemistry | Biology | ||||||||||||
Chapter 3 Electrochemistry
Electrochemical Cells
Electrochemistry is the study of the relationship between electricity and chemical reactions. It involves converting chemical energy from spontaneous reactions into electrical energy and using electrical energy to drive non-spontaneous chemical reactions.
Electrochemical methods are used for industrial production of many chemicals and metals (e.g., sodium hydroxide, chlorine, aluminum). Batteries and fuel cells, which convert chemical energy to electricity, are important applications.
An electrochemical cell is a device that facilitates the interconversion of chemical and electrical energy.
There are two main types of electrochemical cells:
- Galvanic cell (or Voltaic cell): Converts the energy released from a spontaneous redox reaction into electrical energy. Example: Daniell cell.
- Electrolytic cell: Uses electrical energy from an external source to drive a non-spontaneous chemical reaction (electrolysis).
The Daniell cell is a classic example of a galvanic cell. It involves the spontaneous redox reaction:
$\textsf{Zn(s)} + \textsf{Cu}^{2+}\text{(aq)} \to \textsf{Zn}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + \textsf{Cu(s)}$
This reaction converts chemical energy into electrical energy, producing an electric potential (voltage) of 1.1 V under standard conditions.
If an external voltage is applied to a Daniell cell, opposing the cell's potential:
- If external voltage ($\textsf{E}_{\text{ext}}$) < 1.1 V, the cell functions as a galvanic cell (spontaneous reaction produces electricity). Electrons flow from Zn to Cu.
- If $\textsf{E}_{\text{ext}}$ = 1.1 V, the reaction stops, and no current flows (equilibrium).
- If $\textsf{E}_{\text{ext}}$ > 1.1 V, the reaction reverses. The cell now functions as an electrolytic cell, using electrical energy to drive the non-spontaneous reaction ($\textsf{Zn}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + \textsf{Cu(s)} \to \textsf{Zn(s)} + \textsf{Cu}^{2+}\text{(aq)}$). Electrons flow from Cu to Zn (opposite direction).
Galvanic Cells
A galvanic cell converts the Gibbs energy of a spontaneous redox reaction into electrical work. The overall redox reaction is separated into two half-reactions: oxidation and reduction.
In the Daniell cell reaction ($\textsf{Zn(s)} + \textsf{Cu}^{2+}\text{(aq)} \to \textsf{Zn}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + \textsf{Cu(s)}$):
- Reduction half-reaction: $\textsf{Cu}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 2\textsf{e}^{-} \to \textsf{Cu(s)}$ (Occurs at the cathode)
- Oxidation half-reaction: $\textsf{Zn(s)} \to \textsf{Zn}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 2\textsf{e}^{-}$ (Occurs at the anode)
A galvanic cell consists of two half-cells. Each half-cell contains a metallic electrode dipped into an electrolyte solution. The half where oxidation occurs is the anode (negative electrode in a galvanic cell), and the half where reduction occurs is the cathode (positive electrode).
The two half-cells are typically connected externally by a metallic wire (allowing electron flow) and internally by a salt bridge (allowing ion flow to maintain electrical neutrality). Sometimes, both electrodes are in the same electrolyte, eliminating the need for a salt bridge.
At the interface between an electrode and its electrolyte, a potential difference develops due to the tendency of metal atoms to form ions and ions to deposit as metal. This is the electrode potential. When the concentrations of species are unity (1 M), the electrode potential is the standard electrode potential (E°).
In a galvanic cell, the potential difference between the cathode and anode is the cell potential (E$_{cell}$). When no current is drawn, this is the cell's electromotive force (emf).
Conventionally, galvanic cells are represented with the anode on the left and cathode on the right. A single vertical line separates the metal from its electrolyte solution, and a double vertical line represents the salt bridge (or internal connection between electrolytes).
Example: Cell reaction: $\textsf{Cu(s)} + 2\textsf{Ag}^{+}\text{(aq)} \to \textsf{Cu}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 2\textsf{Ag(s)}$.
Half-reactions: Cathode (reduction): $2\textsf{Ag}^{+}\text{(aq)} + 2\textsf{e}^{-} \to 2\textsf{Ag(s)}$; Anode (oxidation): $\textsf{Cu(s)} \to \textsf{Cu}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 2\textsf{e}^{-}$.
Cell representation: $\textsf{Cu(s) | Cu}^{2+}\text{(aq)} || \textsf{Ag}^{+}\text{(aq) | Ag(s)}$.
Cell emf: $\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = \textsf{E}_{\text{right}} - \textsf{E}_{\text{left}} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{Ag}^{+}|\text{Ag}} - \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{Cu}^{2+}|\text{Cu}}$.
Measurement Of Electrode Potential
Individual half-cell potentials cannot be measured directly. Only the difference between two half-cell potentials (the cell emf) can be measured.
To determine the standard electrode potential of a half-cell, it is coupled with a reference electrode whose potential is arbitrarily assigned a value. The Standard Hydrogen Electrode (SHE) is the universally accepted reference electrode, assigned a zero potential at all temperatures.
SHE reaction: $\textsf{H}^{+}\text{(aq)} + \textsf{e}^{-} \to 1/2 \textsf{H}_2\text{(g)}$.
SHE construction: A platinum electrode coated with platinum black, immersed in an acidic solution with 1 M $\textsf{H}^{+}$ concentration, with pure hydrogen gas at 1 bar pressure bubbled through it.
When a half-cell with standard conditions (1 M concentration of ions, 1 bar gas pressure) is connected as the cathode to an SHE anode, the measured cell emf is the standard reduction potential of that half-cell ($\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{right}} - \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{left}} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{right}} - 0 = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{right}}$).
Example: $\textsf{Pt(s)} | \textsf{H}_2\text{(g, 1 bar)} | \textsf{H}^{+}\text{(aq, 1 M)} || \textsf{Cu}^{2+}\text{(aq, 1 M)} | \textsf{Cu(s)}$. Measured emf is +0.34 V. So, $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{Cu}^{2+}|\text{Cu}} = +0.34$ V.
Example: $\textsf{Pt(s)} | \textsf{H}_2\text{(g, 1 bar)} | \textsf{H}^{+}\text{(aq, 1 M)} || \textsf{Zn}^{2+}\text{(aq, 1 M)} | \textsf{Zn(s)}$. Measured emf is -0.76 V. So, $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{Zn}^{2+}|\text{Zn}} = -0.76$ V.
Standard electrode potentials (standard reduction potentials) indicate the relative tendency of a species to be reduced. Higher positive $\textsf{E}^0$ indicates a stronger tendency for reduction (and weaker reducing agent). More negative $\textsf{E}^0$ indicates a weaker tendency for reduction (and stronger reducing agent).
For the Daniell cell ($\textsf{Zn | Zn}^{2+} || \textsf{Cu}^{2+} | \textsf{Cu}$), $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{Cu}^{2+}|\text{Cu}} - \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{Zn}^{2+}|\text{Zn}} = 0.34 \text{ V} - (-0.76 \text{ V}) = 1.10 \text{ V}$.
Inert electrodes (like Pt or Au) are used when the reaction involves ions or gases, providing a surface for electron transfer without participating chemically (e.g., Pt in $\textsf{H}_2$ electrode, $\textsf{Br}_2$ electrode).
Standard electrode potentials allow us to predict the feasibility of redox reactions and the relative strengths of oxidising and reducing agents (strongest oxidising agent has highest $\textsf{E}^0$, strongest reducing agent has lowest $\textsf{E}^0$).
| Reaction (Oxidised form + ne$^-$ $\to$ Reduced form) | E$^\circ$/V |
|---|---|
| F$_2$(g) + 2e$^-$ $\to$ 2F$^-$ | 2.87 |
| Co$^{3+}$ + e$^-$ $\to$ Co$^{2+}$ | 1.81 |
| H$_2$O$_2$ + 2H$^+$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ 2H$_2$O | 1.78 |
| MnO$_4^-$ + 8H$^+$ + 5e$^-$ $\to$ Mn$^{2+}$ + 4H$_2$O | 1.51 |
| Au$^{3+}$ + 3e$^-$ $\to$ Au(s) | 1.40 |
| Cl$_2$(g) + 2e$^-$ $\to$ 2Cl$^-$ | 1.36 |
| Cr$_2$O$_7^{2-}$ + 14H$^+$ + 6e$^-$ $\to$ 2Cr$^{3+}$ + 7H$_2$O | 1.33 |
| O$_2$(g) + 4H$^+$ + 4e$^-$ $\to$ 2H$_2$O | 1.23 |
| MnO$_2$(s) + 4H$^+$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ Mn$^{2+}$ + 2H$_2$O | 1.23 |
| Br$_2$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ 2Br$^-$ | 1.09 |
| NO$_3^-$ + 4H$^+$ + 3e$^-$ $\to$ NO(g) + 2H$_2$O | 0.97 |
| 2Hg$^{2+}$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ Hg$_2^{2+}$ | 0.92 |
| Ag$^+$ + e$^-$ $\to$ Ag(s) | 0.80 |
| Fe$^{3+}$ + e$^-$ $\to$ Fe$^{2+}$ | 0.77 |
| O$_2$(g) + 2H$^+$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ H$_2$O$_2$ | 0.68 |
| I$_2$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ 2I$^-$ | 0.54 |
| Cu$^+$ + e$^-$ $\to$ Cu(s) | 0.52 |
| Cu$^{2+}$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ Cu(s) | 0.34 |
| AgCl(s) + e$^-$ $\to$ Ag(s) + Cl$^-$ | 0.22 |
| AgBr(s) + e$^-$ $\to$ Ag(s) + Br$^-$ | 0.10 |
| 2H$^+$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ H$_2$(g) | 0.00 |
| Pb$^{2+}$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ Pb(s) | -0.13 |
| Sn$^{2+}$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ Sn(s) | -0.14 |
| Ni$^{2+}$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ Ni(s) | -0.25 |
| Fe$^{2+}$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ Fe(s) | -0.44 |
| Cr$^{3+}$ + 3e$^-$ $\to$ Cr(s) | -0.74 |
| Zn$^{2+}$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ Zn(s) | -0.76 |
| 2H$_2$O + 2e$^-$ $\to$ H$_2$(g) + 2OH$^-$ (aq) | -0.83 |
| Al$^{3+}$ + 3e$^-$ $\to$ Al(s) | -1.66 |
| Mg$^{2+}$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ Mg(s) | -2.36 |
| Na$^+$ + e$^-$ $\to$ Na(s) | -2.71 |
| Ca$^{2+}$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ Ca(s) | -2.87 |
| K$^+$ + e$^-$ $\to$ K(s) | -2.93 |
| Li$^+$ + e$^-$ $\to$ Li(s) | -3.05 |
Intext Questions
3.1 How would you determine the standard electrode potential of the system Mg$^{2+}$|Mg?
3.2 Can you store copper sulphate solutions in a zinc pot?
3.3 Consult the table of standard electrode potentials and suggest three substances that can oxidise ferrous ions under suitable conditions.
Answer:
3.1 To determine the standard electrode potential of the Mg$^{2+}$|Mg system, you would set up a galvanic cell consisting of a Standard Hydrogen Electrode (SHE) and a magnesium half-cell under standard conditions. The magnesium electrode would be dipped in a 1 M MgSO$_4$ (or any soluble Mg$^{2+}$ salt) solution, and the SHE would be the other half-cell (Pt electrode in 1 M H$^+$ solution with H$_2$ gas at 1 bar). The two half-cells are connected by a salt bridge and an external circuit with a voltmeter.
Since magnesium is more reactive than hydrogen (Mg is a stronger reducing agent), the magnesium half-cell will act as the anode (oxidation: Mg $\to$ Mg$^{2+}$ + 2e$^-$), and the SHE will act as the cathode (reduction: 2H$^+$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ H$_2$). The cell can be represented as: Mg(s) | Mg$^{2+}$ (1 M) || H$^{+}$ (1 M) | H$_2$ (g, 1 bar) | Pt(s).
The standard cell potential ($\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$) is measured by the voltmeter. According to the convention $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{right}} - \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{left}} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{SHE}} - \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{Mg}^{2+}|\text{Mg}}$.
Since $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{SHE}}$ is 0.00 V, $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} = 0.00 - \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{Mg}^{2+}|\text{Mg}}$.
The measured $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$ will be negative (because Mg is oxidised and H$^+$ is reduced spontaneously in this setup). The negative value of the measured emf will give the standard electrode potential of the Mg$^{2+}$|Mg system.
3.2 No, you cannot store copper sulphate solutions in a zinc pot. From the table of standard electrode potentials, the standard reduction potential for Zn$^{2+}$|Zn is -0.76 V, and for Cu$^{2+}$|Cu is +0.34 V.
Since the standard reduction potential of zinc (-0.76 V) is lower than that of copper (+0.34 V), zinc metal is a stronger reducing agent than copper metal. This means zinc has a greater tendency to be oxidised than copper.
When copper sulphate solution (containing Cu$^{2+}$ ions) is placed in a zinc pot, a spontaneous redox reaction will occur:
Zn(s) + Cu$^{2+}$(aq) $\to$ Zn$^{2+}$(aq) + Cu(s)
The zinc pot will be oxidised (corroded) to Zn$^{2+}$ ions, and copper ions from the solution will be reduced and deposited on the surface of the zinc pot. This will damage the pot and contaminate the copper sulphate solution.
3.3 To oxidise ferrous ions ($\textsf{Fe}^{2+}$), we need a substance that is a stronger oxidising agent than $\textsf{Fe}^{3+}$. An oxidising agent gets reduced. We need a species whose standard reduction potential ($\textsf{E}^0$) is higher than the standard reduction potential for the $\textsf{Fe}^{3+}$ to $\textsf{Fe}^{2+}$ reduction reaction ($\textsf{Fe}^{3+} + \textsf{e}^{-} \to \textsf{Fe}^{2+}$), which is +0.77 V from Table 3.1.
Looking at Table 3.1, any species on the left side of the reactions with an $\textsf{E}^0$ value greater than +0.77 V can oxidise $\textsf{Fe}^{2+}$ to $\textsf{Fe}^{3+}$. Three such substances are (among many others):
- $\textsf{Ag}^{+}$ ions: $\textsf{Ag}^{+} + \textsf{e}^{-} \to \textsf{Ag(s)}$ ($\textsf{E}^0 = +0.80$ V). Since 0.80 V > 0.77 V, $\textsf{Ag}^{+}$ can oxidise $\textsf{Fe}^{2+}$ ($\textsf{Fe}^{2+} + \textsf{Ag}^{+} \to \textsf{Fe}^{3+} + \textsf{Ag(s)}$).
- $\textsf{Br}_2$: $\textsf{Br}_2 + 2\textsf{e}^{-} \to 2\textsf{Br}^{-}$ ($\textsf{E}^0 = +1.09$ V). Since 1.09 V > 0.77 V, $\textsf{Br}_2$ can oxidise $\textsf{Fe}^{2+}$ ($2\textsf{Fe}^{2+} + \textsf{Br}_2 \to 2\textsf{Fe}^{3+} + 2\textsf{Br}^{-}$).
- $\textsf{MnO}_4^{-}$ ions (in acidic solution): $\textsf{MnO}_4^{-} + 8\textsf{H}^{+} + 5\textsf{e}^{-} \to \textsf{Mn}^{2+} + 4\textsf{H}_2\textsf{O}$ ($\textsf{E}^0 = +1.51$ V). Since 1.51 V > 0.77 V, $\textsf{MnO}_4^{-}$ can oxidise $\textsf{Fe}^{2+}$ ($5\textsf{Fe}^{2+} + \textsf{MnO}_4^{-} + 8\textsf{H}^{+} \to 5\textsf{Fe}^{3+} + \textsf{Mn}^{2+} + 4\textsf{H}_2\textsf{O}$).
Nernst Equation
The standard electrode potentials ($\textsf{E}^0$) are defined for unit concentrations (1 M) and unit pressures (1 bar). However, in real electrochemical cells, concentrations and pressures are often different from standard conditions. The Nernst equation relates the electrode potential or cell potential at any concentration to its standard potential.
For a general electrode reaction: $\textsf{M}^{\text{n}+}\text{(aq)} + \textsf{ne}^{-} \to \textsf{M(s)}$
The electrode potential (E) at any concentration of $\textsf{M}^{\text{n}+}$ is given by:
$\textsf{E}_{\text{M}^{\text{n}+}|\text{M}} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{M}^{\text{n}+}|\text{M}} - \frac{\textsf{RT}}{\textsf{nF}} \ln \frac{\text{[M(s)]}}{[\textsf{M}^{\text{n}+}\text{(aq)}]}$
Since the concentration/activity of a pure solid is taken as unity ([M(s)] = 1):
$\textsf{E}_{\text{M}^{\text{n}+}|\text{M}} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{M}^{\text{n}+}|\text{M}} - \frac{\textsf{RT}}{\textsf{nF}} \ln \frac{1}{[\textsf{M}^{\text{n}+}\text{(aq)}]}$
Where R is the gas constant (8.314 J K$^{-1}$ mol$^{-1}$), T is temperature in Kelvin, n is the number of electrons involved in the half-reaction, F is Faraday's constant (96487 C mol$^{-1}$), and $[\textsf{M}^{\text{n}+}\text{(aq)}]$ is the molar concentration of the ion.
At 298 K (25$^\circ$C), converting the natural logarithm ($\ln$) to base 10 logarithm ($\log_{10}$, where $\ln x = 2.303 \log_{10} x$) and substituting values for R, T, and F ($\frac{2.303 \times 8.314 \times 298}{96487} \approx 0.0591$):
$\textsf{E}_{\text{M}^{\text{n}+}|\text{M}} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{M}^{\text{n}+}|\text{M}} - \frac{0.0591}{\textsf{n}} \log \frac{1}{[\textsf{M}^{\text{n}+}\text{(aq)}]}$
For a complete cell reaction, E$_{cell}$ is the difference between the reduction potentials of the cathode and anode ($\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = \textsf{E}_{\text{cathode}} - \textsf{E}_{\text{anode}}$). Applying the Nernst equation to each half-cell potential gives the cell potential:
For a general reaction: $\textsf{aA} + \textsf{bB} \to \textsf{cC} + \textsf{dD}$ (where A and B are reactants, C and D are products, and n electrons are transferred)
The Nernst equation for the cell potential is:
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} - \frac{\textsf{RT}}{\textsf{nF}} \ln \text{Q} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} - \frac{\textsf{RT}}{\textsf{nF}} \ln \frac{[\textsf{C}]^{\text{c}}[\textsf{D}]^{\text{d}}}{[\textsf{A}]^{\text{a}}[\textsf{B}]^{\text{b}}}$
Where Q is the reaction quotient, using molar concentrations for aqueous species and partial pressures for gases. Activities of pure solids/liquids are taken as unity.
At 298 K:
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} - \frac{0.0591}{\textsf{n}} \log \frac{[\textsf{C}]^{\text{c}}[\textsf{D}]^{\text{d}}}{[\textsf{A}]^{\text{a}}[\textsf{B}]^{\text{b}}}$
Example 3.1 Represent the cell in which the following reaction takes place Mg(s) + 2Ag$^{+}$(0.0001M) $\to$ Mg$^{2+}$(0.130M) + 2Ag(s). Calculate its E(cell) if $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$ = 3.17 V.
Answer:
The cell representation is: Mg(s) | Mg$^{2+}$(0.130 M) || Ag$^{+}$(0.0001 M) | Ag(s).
Cell reaction: Mg(s) + 2Ag$^{+}$(aq) $\to$ Mg$^{2+}$(aq) + 2Ag(s).
Number of electrons transferred, n = 2 (Mg $\to$ Mg$^{2+}$ + 2e$^-$, 2Ag$^+$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ 2Ag).
Reactant concentrations (ions): [Ag$^+$] = 0.0001 M, [Mg$^{2+}$] = 0.130 M.
$\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$ = 3.17 V.
Using the Nernst equation at 298 K:
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} - \frac{0.0591}{\textsf{n}} \log \frac{[\text{Products}]}{[\text{Reactants}]}$
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} - \frac{0.0591}{2} \log \frac{[\textsf{Mg}^{2+}]}{[\textsf{Ag}^{+}]^2}$ (Pure solids Mg and Ag have activity = 1)
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 3.17 \text{ V} - \frac{0.0591}{2} \log \frac{0.130}{(0.0001)^2}$
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 3.17 \text{ V} - 0.02955 \log \frac{0.130}{1 \times 10^{-8}}$
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 3.17 \text{ V} - 0.02955 \log (0.130 \times 10^8)$
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 3.17 \text{ V} - 0.02955 \log (1.3 \times 10^7)$
$\log (1.3 \times 10^7) = \log 1.3 + \log 10^7 \approx 0.114 + 7 = 7.114$
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 3.17 \text{ V} - 0.02955 \times 7.114$
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 3.17 \text{ V} - 0.2103$ V
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 2.9597 \text{ V} \approx 2.96 \text{ V}$.
Equilibrium Constant From Nernst Equation
As a galvanic cell operates, the concentrations of reactants decrease, and product concentrations increase. This causes the cell potential (E$_{cell}$) to decrease over time. Eventually, the reaction reaches equilibrium, at which point $\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 0$ V, and the reaction quotient Q becomes equal to the equilibrium constant ($\textsf{K}_\text{c}$).
At equilibrium, the Nernst equation for the cell becomes:
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 0 = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} - \frac{\textsf{RT}}{\textsf{nF}} \ln \text{K}_\text{c}$
Rearranging:
$\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} = \frac{\textsf{RT}}{\textsf{nF}} \ln \text{K}_\text{c}$
Or, converting to log$_{10}$ at 298 K:
$\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} = \frac{0.0591}{\textsf{n}} \log \textsf{K}_\text{c}$
This equation provides a relationship between the standard cell potential ($\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$) and the equilibrium constant ($\textsf{K}_\text{c}$) of the cell reaction. $\textsf{K}_\text{c}$ can be calculated from a measured $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$.
Example 3.2 Calculate the equilibrium constant of the reaction: Cu(s) + 2Ag$^{+}$(aq) $\to$ Cu$^{2+}$(aq) + 2Ag(s). $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$ = 0.46 V.
Answer:
Reaction: Cu(s) + 2Ag$^{+}$(aq) $\to$ Cu$^{2+}$(aq) + 2Ag(s).
Number of electrons transferred, n = 2 (Cu $\to$ Cu$^{2+}$ + 2e$^-$, 2Ag$^+$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ 2Ag).
$\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$ = 0.46 V.
Using the relationship between $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$ and $\textsf{K}_\text{c}$ at 298 K:
$\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} = \frac{0.0591}{\textsf{n}} \log \textsf{K}_\text{c}$
$0.46 \text{ V} = \frac{0.0591}{2} \log \textsf{K}_\text{c}$
$0.46 \times 2 = 0.0591 \log \textsf{K}_\text{c}$
$0.92 = 0.0591 \log \textsf{K}_\text{c}$
$\log \textsf{K}_\text{c} = \frac{0.92}{0.0591} \approx 15.567$.
$\textsf{K}_\text{c} = 10^{15.567} = 10^{0.567} \times 10^{15} \approx 3.68 \times 10^{15}$.
The equilibrium constant is approximately $3.68 \times 10^{15}$. (Textbook answer $3.92 \times 10^{15}$ - slight difference due to value of 0.0591 vs 0.059 used).
Electrochemical Cell And Gibbs Energy Of The Reaction
The electrical work done by a galvanic cell is equal to the decrease in its Gibbs energy ($\Delta_\text{r}$G). For maximum work, the process must be reversible. If E$_{cell}$ is the cell potential and nF is the total charge transferred (n moles of electrons $\times$ Faraday constant), then:
Electrical work = Charge $\times$ Potential = nF $\times$ E$_{cell}$
$\Delta_\text{r}$G = - (Electrical work) = - nF E$_{cell}$
This equation relates Gibbs energy change ($\Delta_\text{r}$G) to the cell potential (E$_{cell}$). $\Delta_\text{r}$G is an extensive property, while E$_{cell}$ is intensive. The value of $\Delta_\text{r}$G depends on the number of electrons transferred (n) for the specific reaction as written.
Under standard conditions (all reactants and products at unit activity/concentration), E$_{cell}$ becomes $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$, and $\Delta_\text{r}$G becomes $\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ (standard Gibbs energy change):
$\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ = - nF $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$
This equation allows calculating $\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ from standard cell potentials. $\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ is also related to the equilibrium constant ($\textsf{K}_\text{c}$) by $\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ = - RT $\ln$ $\textsf{K}_\text{c}$. Combining these relationships, we get $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} = \frac{\textsf{RT}}{\textsf{nF}} \ln \textsf{K}_\text{c}$, which is the relationship derived from the Nernst equation at equilibrium.
Example 3.3 The standard electrode potential for Daniell cell is 1.1V. Calculate the standard Gibbs energy for the reaction: Zn(s) + Cu$^{2+}$(aq) $\to$ Zn$^{2+}$(aq) + Cu(s).
Answer:
Reaction: Zn(s) + Cu$^{2+}$(aq) $\to$ Zn$^{2+}$(aq) + Cu(s).
Standard cell potential, $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$ = 1.1 V.
Number of electrons transferred, n = 2.
Faraday constant, F = 96487 C mol$^{-1}$.
Using the formula: $\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ = - nF $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$.
$\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ = - (2) $\times$ (96487 C mol$^{-1}$) $\times$ (1.1 V)
$\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ = - 2 $\times$ 1.1 $\times$ 96487 J mol$^{-1}$ (Since 1 V C = 1 J)
$\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ = - 2.2 $\times$ 96487 J mol$^{-1}$
$\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ = - 212271.4 J mol$^{-1}$.
Converting to kJ/mol: $\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ = $\frac{-212271.4}{1000}$ kJ mol$^{-1} = -212.2714$ kJ mol$^{-1}$.
The standard Gibbs energy for the reaction is approximately -212.27 kJ/mol.
Intext Questions
3.4 Calculate the potential of hydrogen electrode in contact with a solution whose pH is 10.
3.5 Calculate the emf of the cell in which the following reaction takes place:
Ni(s) + 2Ag$^{+}$ (0.002 M) $\to$ Ni$^{2+}$ (0.160 M) + 2Ag(s)
Given that $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$ = 1.05 V
3.6 The cell in which the following reaction occurs:
$2 \textsf{Fe}^{3+}\text{(aq)} + 2\textsf{I}^{-}\text{(aq)} \to 2\textsf{Fe}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + \textsf{I}_2\text{(s)}$ has $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$ = 0.236 V at 298 K. Calculate the standard Gibbs energy and the equilibrium constant of the cell reaction.
Answer:
3.4 The half-reaction for a hydrogen electrode is: 2H$^{+}$(aq) + 2e$^-$ $\to$ H$_2$(g).
The standard hydrogen electrode potential $\textsf{E}^0_{\text{H}^{+}/\text{H}_2}$ = 0.00 V.
pH = 10 means $[\textsf{H}^{+}] = 10^{-\text{pH}} = 10^{-10}$ M.
Assume hydrogen gas pressure $\textsf{p}_{\textsf{H}_2}$ = 1 bar (standard condition for gas).
Using the Nernst equation for the reduction half-reaction:
$\textsf{E}_{\text{H}^{+}/\text{H}_2} = \textsf{E}^0_{\text{H}^{+}/\text{H}_2} - \frac{\textsf{RT}}{\textsf{nF}} \ln \frac{\text{[Products}]}{[\text{Reactants}]}$
$\textsf{E}_{\text{H}^{+}/\text{H}_2} = 0.00 \text{ V} - \frac{0.0591}{2} \log \frac{\textsf{p}_{\textsf{H}_2}}{[\textsf{H}^{+}]^2}$ (at 298 K, n=2)
$\textsf{E}_{\text{H}^{+}/\text{H}_2} = -0.02955 \log \frac{1}{(10^{-10})^2} = -0.02955 \log \frac{1}{10^{-20}}$
$\textsf{E}_{\text{H}^{+}/\text{H}_2} = -0.02955 \log (10^{20}) = -0.02955 \times 20$
$\textsf{E}_{\text{H}^{+}/\text{H}_2} = -0.591$ V.
The potential of the hydrogen electrode is -0.591 V.
3.5 Cell reaction: Ni(s) + 2Ag$^{+}$(aq) $\to$ Ni$^{2+}$(aq) + 2Ag(s).
Number of electrons transferred, n = 2 (Ni $\to$ Ni$^{2+}$ + 2e$^-$, 2Ag$^+$ + 2e$^-$ $\to$ 2Ag).
Given concentrations: [Ag$^+$] = 0.002 M, [Ni$^{2+}$] = 0.160 M.
$\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$ = 1.05 V.
Using the Nernst equation at 298 K:
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} - \frac{0.0591}{\textsf{n}} \log \frac{[\text{Products}]}{[\text{Reactants}]}$
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = \textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} - \frac{0.0591}{2} \log \frac{[\textsf{Ni}^{2+}]}{[\textsf{Ag}^{+}]^2}$ (Pure solids Ni and Ag have activity = 1)
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 1.05 \text{ V} - \frac{0.0591}{2} \log \frac{0.160}{(0.002)^2}$
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 1.05 \text{ V} - 0.02955 \log \frac{0.160}{4 \times 10^{-6}}$
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 1.05 \text{ V} - 0.02955 \log (0.04 \times 10^6)$
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 1.05 \text{ V} - 0.02955 \log (4 \times 10^4)$
$\log (4 \times 10^4) = \log 4 + \log 10^4 \approx 0.602 + 4 = 4.602$
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 1.05 \text{ V} - 0.02955 \times 4.602$
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 1.05 \text{ V} - 0.136$ V
$\textsf{E}_{\text{cell}} = 0.914 \text{ V} \approx 0.91 \text{ V}$.
3.6 Reaction: $2 \textsf{Fe}^{3+}\text{(aq)} + 2\textsf{I}^{-}\text{(aq)} \to 2\textsf{Fe}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + \textsf{I}_2\text{(s)}$.
Standard cell potential, $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$ = 0.236 V at 298 K.
Number of electrons transferred, n = 2 (Each $\textsf{Fe}^{3+}$ gains 1 electron, so 2 $\textsf{Fe}^{3+}$ gain 2 electrons. Or 2 $\textsf{I}^{-}$ lose 2 electrons to form $\textsf{I}_2$).
Standard Gibbs energy change, $\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ = - nF $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}}$.
F = 96487 C mol$^{-1}$.
$\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ = - (2) $\times$ (96487 C mol$^{-1}$) $\times$ (0.236 V)
$\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ = - 2 $\times$ 0.236 $\times$ 96487 J mol$^{-1}$
$\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ = - 0.472 $\times$ 96487 J mol$^{-1}$
$\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ = - 45542.064 J mol$^{-1}$.
$\Delta_\text{r}$G$^\circ$ = $\frac{-45542.064}{1000}$ kJ mol$^{-1} = -45.542 \text{ kJ mol}^{-1}$. (Textbook answer -45.54 kJmol$^{-1}$).
Equilibrium constant, $\textsf{K}_\text{c}$. Using $\textsf{E}^{0}_{\text{cell}} = \frac{0.0591}{\textsf{n}} \log \textsf{K}_\text{c}$ at 298 K.
$0.236 \text{ V} = \frac{0.0591}{2} \log \textsf{K}_\text{c}$
$0.236 \times 2 = 0.0591 \log \textsf{K}_\text{c}$
$0.472 = 0.0591 \log \textsf{K}_\text{c}$
$\log \textsf{K}_\text{c} = \frac{0.472}{0.0591} \approx 7.986$.
$\textsf{K}_\text{c} = 10^{7.986} = 10^{0.986} \times 10^7 \approx 9.68 \times 10^7$.
The equilibrium constant is approximately $9.68 \times 10^7$. (Textbook answer $9.62 \times 10^7$).
Conductance Of Electrolytic Solutions
Electrical resistance (R) of a conductor is measured in ohm ($\Omega$). It's proportional to length (l) and inversely proportional to area (A): $\textsf{R} = \rho \frac{l}{A}$, where $\rho$ is resistivity (specific resistance) with units ohm-metre ($\Omega$ m).
Conductance (G) is the inverse of resistance: $\textsf{G} = \frac{1}{R} = \frac{1}{\rho} \frac{A}{l} = \kappa \frac{A}{l}$. Measured in siemens (S), equal to ohm$^{-1}$ ($\Omega^{-1}$).
Conductivity (specific conductance) ($\kappa$) is the inverse of resistivity: $\kappa = \frac{1}{\rho}$. Units are S m$^{-1}$ or S cm$^{-1}$. Conductivity is the conductance of a material 1 m long with 1 m$^2$ area.
Materials are classified by conductivity magnitude: conductors (high $\kappa$, e.g., metals), insulators (very low $\kappa$, e.g., glass), semiconductors (intermediate $\kappa$, e.g., Si, Ge), superconductors (infinite $\kappa$).
Electronic (metallic) conductance: Due to electron movement in metals. Depends on metal nature, number of valence electrons, and temperature (decreases with T).
Electrolytic (ionic) conductance: Due to ion movement in solutions/melts. Pure water has very low conductivity due to self-ionisation. Dissolving electrolytes increases conductivity by adding more ions. Ionic conductance depends on:
- Nature of electrolyte.
- Size and solvation of ions.
- Solvent nature and viscosity.
- Concentration of electrolyte.
- Temperature (increases with T as ion mobility increases).
Electrolysis (passage of DC) changes the composition of electrolytic solutions.
Measurement Of The Conductivity Of Ionic Solutions
Measuring the resistance of ionic solutions is tricky: DC causes electrolysis, and solutions can't be connected like wires. Solutions:
- Use an alternating current (AC) source to prevent electrolysis.
- Use a conductivity cell (Fig. 3.4). Consists of two platinized platinum electrodes (area A, distance l) confining the solution. Resistance is $\textsf{R} = \rho \frac{l}{A} = \frac{1}{\kappa} \frac{l}{A}$.
The term $\frac{l}{A}$ is the cell constant (G*). Units are m$^{-1}$ or cm$^{-1}$. It's determined by measuring resistance of a solution with known conductivity (e.g., KCl solution): $\textsf{G}^* = \textsf{R} \kappa$. Once $\textsf{G}^*$ is known, conductivity of any solution can be found from its measured resistance in the same cell: $\kappa = \frac{\textsf{G}^*}{\textsf{R}}$.
Resistance is measured using a Wheatstone bridge setup with an AC source (oscillator) and detector.
Unknown resistance R$_2 = \frac{R_1 R_4}{R_3}$. Conductivity $\kappa = \frac{G^*}{R_2}$. Conductivity meters directly display conductivity/resistance.
Different electrolytes have different conductivity. To compare conductivity of solutions with different concentrations, molar conductivity ($\Lambda_\text{m}$) is used. It's defined as the conductivity of the solution containing one mole of electrolyte.
$\Lambda_\text{m} = \frac{\kappa}{\text{c}}$
Where $\kappa$ is conductivity and c is molar concentration. If $\kappa$ is in S m$^{-1}$ and c in mol m$^{-3}$, $\Lambda_\text{m}$ is in S m$^2$ mol$^{-1}$. If $\kappa$ is in S cm$^{-1}$ and c in mol L$^{-1}$, $\Lambda_\text{m} = \frac{\kappa \times 1000}{\text{c}}$ in S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$. $1 \text{ S m}^2\text{mol}^{-1} = 10^4 \text{ S cm}^2\text{mol}^{-1}$.Example 3.4 Resistance of a conductivity cell filled with 0.1 mol L$^{-1}$ KCl solution is 100 $\Omega$. If the resistance of the same cell when filled with 0.02 mol L$^{-1}$ KCl solution is 520 $\Omega$, calculate the conductivity and molar conductivity of 0.02 mol L$^{-1}$ KCl solution. The conductivity of 0.1 mol L$^{-1}$ KCl solution is 1.29 S/m.
Answer:
For 0.1 mol L$^{-1}$ KCl solution:
Conductivity, $\kappa_1 = 1.29$ S/m. Resistance, R$_1 = 100 \Omega$.
Cell constant, G$^* = \kappa_1 \times R_1 = (1.29 \text{ S/m}) \times (100 \Omega) = 129$ m$^{-1}$.
Convert to cm$^{-1}$: 129 m$^{-1} = 129 \times 10^{-2}$ cm$^{-1} = 1.29$ cm$^{-1}$.
For 0.02 mol L$^{-1}$ KCl solution:
Resistance, R$_2 = 520 \Omega$. Cell constant, G$^* = 129$ m$^{-1}$ or 1.29 cm$^{-1}$ (cell constant is same for the cell).
Conductivity, $\kappa_2 = \frac{\text{G}^*}{\text{R}_2} = \frac{129 \text{ m}^{-1}}{520 \Omega} \approx 0.248 \text{ S/m}$.
Convert to S cm$^{-1}$: $\kappa_2 = \frac{1.29 \text{ cm}^{-1}}{520 \Omega} \approx 0.00248 \text{ S cm}^{-1}$.
Concentration, c = 0.02 mol L$^{-1}$.
Molar conductivity, $\Lambda_{\text{m}2} = \frac{\kappa_2}{\text{c}}$ (using appropriate units).
Using $\kappa_2$ in S/m and converting c to mol m$^{-3}$ (0.02 mol L$^{-1} = 0.02 \times 1000$ mol m$^{-3} = 20$ mol m$^{-3}$):
$\Lambda_{\text{m}2} = \frac{0.248 \text{ S/m}}{20 \text{ mol/m}^3} = 0.0124$ S m$^2$ mol$^{-1}$.
Using $\kappa_2$ in S cm$^{-1}$ and c in mol L$^{-1}$:
$\Lambda_{\text{m}2} = \frac{\kappa_2 \times 1000}{\text{c}} = \frac{0.00248 \text{ S cm}^{-1} \times 1000 \text{ cm}^3/\text{L}}{0.02 \text{ mol/L}} = \frac{2.48}{0.02} = 124$ S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$.
Molar conductivity = 124 S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$ or 0.0124 S m$^2$ mol$^{-1}$. (Textbook answer 0.248 S m$^{-1}$ and 124 $\times$ 10$^{-4}$ S m$^2$mol$^{-1}$ or 124 S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$).
Example 3.5 The electrical resistance of a column of 0.05 mol L$^{-1}$ NaOH solution of diameter 1 cm and length 50 cm is 5.55 $\times$ 10$^3$ ohm. Calculate its resistivity, conductivity and molar conductivity.
Answer:
Concentration, c = 0.05 mol L$^{-1}$.
Resistance, R = 5.55 $\times$ 10$^3 \Omega$.
Diameter = 1 cm, so radius r = 0.5 cm.
Length l = 50 cm.
Area of cross-section, A = $\pi r^2 = \pi \times (0.5 \text{ cm})^2 = 3.14 \times 0.25 \text{ cm}^2 = 0.785 \text{ cm}^2$.
Convert to m$^2$: $0.785 \text{ cm}^2 = 0.785 \times (10^{-2} \text{ m})^2 = 0.785 \times 10^{-4} \text{ m}^2$.
Convert length to m: l = 50 cm = 0.5 m.
Resistivity, $\rho$: $R = \rho \frac{l}{A} \implies \rho = \frac{RA}{l}$.
Using cm units: $\rho = \frac{(5.55 \times 10^3 \Omega) \times (0.785 \text{ cm}^2)}{50 \text{ cm}} = \frac{4350.75}{50} \Omega \text{ cm} = 87.015 \Omega \text{ cm}$. (Textbook answer 87.135 $\Omega$ cm - slight pi value difference).
Using m units: $\rho = \frac{(5.55 \times 10^3 \Omega) \times (0.785 \times 10^{-4} \text{ m}^2)}{0.5 \text{ m}} = \frac{0.435075}{0.5} \Omega \text{ m} = 0.87015 \Omega \text{ m}$. (Textbook answer 87.135 $\times$ 10$^{-2} \Omega$ m).
Conductivity, $\kappa = \frac{1}{\rho}$.
Using cm units: $\kappa = \frac{1}{87.015 \Omega \text{ cm}} \approx 0.01149 \text{ S cm}^{-1}$. (Textbook answer 0.01148 S cm$^{-1}$).
Using m units: $\kappa = \frac{1}{0.87015 \Omega \text{ m}} \approx 1.149 \text{ S m}^{-1}$. (Textbook answer 1.148 S m$^{-1}$).
Molar conductivity, $\Lambda_\text{m}$. Concentration c = 0.05 mol L$^{-1}$.
Using $\kappa$ in S cm$^{-1}$ and c in mol L$^{-1}$:
$\Lambda_\text{m} = \frac{\kappa \times 1000}{\text{c}} = \frac{0.01149 \text{ S cm}^{-1} \times 1000 \text{ cm}^3/\text{L}}{0.05 \text{ mol/L}} = \frac{11.49}{0.05} = 229.8$ S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$.
Using $\kappa$ in S m$^{-1}$ and converting c to mol m$^{-3}$ (0.05 mol L$^{-1} = 50$ mol m$^{-3}$):
$\Lambda_\text{m} = \frac{\kappa}{\text{c}} = \frac{1.149 \text{ S/m}}{50 \text{ mol/m}^3} = 0.02298$ S m$^2$ mol$^{-1}$.
Molar conductivity = 229.8 S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$ or 0.02298 S m$^2$ mol$^{-1}$. (Textbook answer 229.6 S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$ or 229.6 $\times$ 10$^{-4}$ S m$^2$ mol$^{-1}$).
Variation Of Conductivity And Molar Conductivity With Concentration
Conductivity ($\kappa$):
Conductivity is the conductance of a unit volume of solution. On dilution (decreasing concentration), the number of ions per unit volume decreases. Therefore, conductivity ($\kappa$) always decreases with a decrease in concentration for both strong and weak electrolytes.
Molar conductivity ($\Lambda_\text{m}$):
Molar conductivity is the conductance of the volume of solution containing one mole of electrolyte. On dilution, the total volume (V) containing one mole of electrolyte increases. $\Lambda_\text{m} = \kappa \text{V}$. Although $\kappa$ decreases with dilution, the increase in volume V (containing one mole) compensates for this decrease and leads to an overall increase in $\Lambda_\text{m}$.
Molar conductivity ($\Lambda_\text{m}$) always increases with a decrease in concentration (dilution).
As concentration approaches zero (infinite dilution), molar conductivity approaches a maximum value called limiting molar conductivity ($\Lambda^0_\text{m}$).
The variation of $\Lambda_\text{m}$ with concentration differs for strong and weak electrolytes (Fig. 3.6):
- Strong Electrolytes: $\Lambda_\text{m}$ increases slowly with dilution. The increase is mainly due to increased ionic mobility as interionic attractions decrease at lower concentrations. This variation can be described by the Debye-Hückel-Onsager equation: $\Lambda_\text{m} = \Lambda^0_\text{m} - \text{A} \text{c}^{1/2}$. A plot of $\Lambda_\text{m}$ vs $\text{c}^{1/2}$ is linear, allowing $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ to be determined by extrapolation to zero concentration.
- Weak Electrolytes: $\Lambda_\text{m}$ increases steeply with dilution, especially at low concentrations. This is because weak electrolytes dissociate to a very small extent at higher concentrations. Dilution increases the degree of dissociation, increasing the number of ions in solution and thus $\Lambda_\text{m}$. $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ for weak electrolytes cannot be obtained by extrapolation of the $\Lambda_\text{m}$ vs $\text{c}^{1/2}$ plot, as the graph is not linear and becomes very steep near zero concentration.
Example 3.6 The molar conductivity of KCl solutions at different concentrations at 298 K are given below:
c/mol L$^{-1}$ $\Lambda_\text{m}$/S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$
0.000198 148.61
0.000309 148.29
0.000521 147.81
0.000989 147.09
Show that a plot between $\Lambda_\text{m}$ and c$^{1/2}$ is a straight line. Determine the values of $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ and A for KCl.
Answer:
Calculate c$^{1/2}$ for each concentration:
| c/mol L$^{-1}$ | c$^{1/2}$/(mol L$^{-1}$)$^{1/2}$ | $\Lambda_\text{m}$/S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$ |
|---|---|---|
| 0.000198 | 0.01407 | 148.61 |
| 0.000309 | 0.01758 | 148.29 |
| 0.000521 | 0.02283 | 147.81 |
| 0.000989 | 0.03145 | 147.09 |
Plot $\Lambda_\text{m}$ on the y-axis and c$^{1/2}$ on the x-axis. The points fall approximately on a straight line, confirming the relationship for a strong electrolyte.
Determine $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ (y-intercept) and A (-slope) from the graph or by using two points on the line.
Using points (0.01407, 148.61) and (0.03145, 147.09):
Slope = $\frac{147.09 - 148.61}{0.03145 - 0.01407} = \frac{-1.52}{0.01738} \approx -87.46$.
A = -Slope $\approx 87.46$ S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$ (mol/L)$^{-1/2}$.
Equation of line: $\Lambda_\text{m} - 148.61 = -87.46 (c^{1/2} - 0.01407)$.
$\Lambda_\text{m} = -87.46 c^{1/2} + 87.46 \times 0.01407 + 148.61$
$\Lambda_\text{m} = -87.46 c^{1/2} + 1.230 + 148.61 = -87.46 c^{1/2} + 149.84$.
Extrapolating to c$^{1/2} = 0$, the y-intercept $\Lambda^0_\text{m} \approx 149.84$ S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$. (Textbook answer 150.0 S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$ - very close).
Kohlrausch's Law of Independent Migration of Ions: For weak electrolytes, $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ is determined using this law. It states that limiting molar conductivity ($\Lambda^0_\text{m}$) of an electrolyte is the sum of the limiting ionic conductivities of its constituent cation and anion, each multiplied by the number of ions produced per formula unit of the electrolyte.
If an electrolyte dissociates into n$^+$ cations with limiting ionic conductivity $\lambda^0_+$ and n$^-$ anions with limiting ionic conductivity $\lambda^0_-$, then:
$\Lambda^0_\text{m} = \text{n}^+ \lambda^0_+ + \text{n}^- \lambda^0_-$
This law is applicable at infinite dilution, where interionic interactions are negligible, and ions move independently.
Values of $\lambda^0$ for some ions at 298 K are given in Table 3.4.
Example 3.7 Calculate $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ for $\textsf{CaCl}_2$ and $\textsf{MgSO}_4$ from the data given in Table 3.4.
Answer:
For $\textsf{CaCl}_2$: It dissociates as $\textsf{CaCl}_2 \to \textsf{Ca}^{2+} + 2\textsf{Cl}^{-}$. Here, n$^+$ = 1, n$^-$ = 2.
From Table 3.4: $\lambda^0_{\text{Ca}^{2+}} = 119.0$ S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$. $\lambda^0_{\text{Cl}^{-}} = 76.3$ S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$.
$\Lambda^0_{\text{m}}(\textsf{CaCl}_2) = \text{n}^+ \lambda^0_{\text{Ca}^{2+}} + \text{n}^- \lambda^0_{\text{Cl}^{-}} = (1 \times 119.0) + (2 \times 76.3) = 119.0 + 152.6 = 271.6 \text{ S cm}^2 \text{ mol}^{-1}$.
For $\textsf{MgSO}_4$: It dissociates as $\textsf{MgSO}_4 \to \textsf{Mg}^{2+} + \textsf{SO}_4^{2-}$. Here, n$^+$ = 1, n$^-$ = 1.
From Table 3.4: $\lambda^0_{\text{Mg}^{2+}} = 106.0$ S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$. $\lambda^0_{\text{SO}_4^{2-}} = 160.0$ S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$.
$\Lambda^0_{\text{m}}(\textsf{MgSO}_4) = \text{n}^+ \lambda^0_{\text{Mg}^{2+}} + \text{n}^- \lambda^0_{\text{SO}_4^{2-}} = (1 \times 106.0) + (1 \times 160.0) = 106.0 + 160.0 = 266.0 \text{ S cm}^2 \text{ mol}^{-1}$.
Example 3.8 $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ for NaCl, HCl and NaAc are 126.4, 425.9 and 91.0 S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$ respectively. Calculate $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ for HAc.
Answer:
We want to find $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ for HAc (acetic acid, $\textsf{CH}_3\text{COOH}$ or Ac). According to Kohlrausch's law, $\Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{HAc}) = \lambda^0_{\text{H}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{Ac}^{-}}$.
We are given $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ for NaCl, HCl, and NaAc:
$\Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{NaCl}) = \lambda^0_{\text{Na}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{Cl}^{-}} = 126.4$ S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$
$\Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{HCl}) = \lambda^0_{\text{H}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{Cl}^{-}} = 425.9$ S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$
$\Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{NaAc}) = \lambda^0_{\text{Na}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{Ac}^{-}} = 91.0$ S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$
We can manipulate these equations to find $\lambda^0_{\text{H}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{Ac}^{-}}$.
($\lambda^0_{\text{H}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{Cl}^{-}}$) + ($\lambda^0_{\text{Na}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{Ac}^{-}}$) - ($\lambda^0_{\text{Na}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{Cl}^{-}}$) = ($\lambda^0_{\text{H}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{Ac}^{-}}$)
This translates to:
$\Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{HCl}) + \Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{NaAc}) - \Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{NaCl}) = \Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{HAc})$
$\Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{HAc}) = 425.9 + 91.0 - 126.4$ S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$
$\Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{HAc}) = 516.9 - 126.4 = 390.5 \text{ S cm}^2 \text{ mol}^{-1}$.
Applications of Kohlrausch law:
- Calculating $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ for any electrolyte by summing $\lambda^0$ of individual ions.
- Calculating $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ for weak electrolytes using $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ values of strong electrolytes (as shown in Example 3.8).
- Determining the degree of dissociation ($\alpha$) of a weak electrolyte at a given concentration c using $\alpha = \frac{\Lambda_\text{m}(\text{c})}{\Lambda^0_\text{m}}$.
- Calculating the dissociation constant ($\textsf{K}_\text{a}$) of a weak electrolyte using its degree of dissociation and concentration (e.g., for a weak acid HA $\rightleftharpoons$ H$^+$ + A$^-$, $\textsf{K}_\text{a} = \frac{[\textsf{H}^+][\textsf{A}^-]}{[\textsf{HA}]} = \frac{\text{c}\alpha^2}{1-\alpha}$ for dilute solutions, where concentrations are approximated by molarity).
Example 3.9 The conductivity of 0.001028 mol L$^{-1}$ acetic acid is 4.95 $\times$ 10$^{-5}$ S cm$^{-1}$. Calculate its dissociation constant if $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ for acetic acid is 390.5 S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$.
Answer:
Concentration, c = 0.001028 mol L$^{-1}$.
Conductivity, $\kappa = 4.95 \times 10^{-5}$ S cm$^{-1}$.
Limiting molar conductivity, $\Lambda^0_\text{m} = 390.5$ S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$.
First, calculate the molar conductivity ($\Lambda_\text{m}$) at the given concentration c:
$\Lambda_\text{m} = \frac{\kappa \times 1000}{\text{c}} = \frac{(4.95 \times 10^{-5} \text{ S cm}^{-1}) \times 1000 \text{ cm}^3/\text{L}}{0.001028 \text{ mol/L}} = \frac{4.95 \times 10^{-2}}{0.001028} \text{ S cm}^2 \text{ mol}^{-1} \approx 48.15$ S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$.
Calculate the degree of dissociation ($\alpha$) using $\Lambda_\text{m}$ and $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$:
$\alpha = \frac{\Lambda_\text{m}}{\Lambda^0_\text{m}} = \frac{48.15 \text{ S cm}^2 \text{ mol}^{-1}}{390.5 \text{ S cm}^2 \text{ mol}^{-1}} \approx 0.1233$.
Acetic acid (HAc) is a weak acid that dissociates as: HAc $\rightleftharpoons$ H$^+$ + Ac$^-$
Initial concentrations (M): c 0 0
Change (M): -c$\alpha$ +c$\alpha$ +c$\alpha$
Equilibrium concentrations (M): c(1-$\alpha$) c$\alpha$ c$\alpha$
Dissociation constant, $\textsf{K}_\text{a} = \frac{[\textsf{H}^+][\textsf{Ac}^-]}{[\textsf{HAc}]} = \frac{(\textsf{c}\alpha)(\textsf{c}\alpha)}{\textsf{c}(1-\alpha)} = \frac{\textsf{c}\alpha^2}{1-\alpha}$.
Substitute the values of c and $\alpha$:
$\textsf{K}_\text{a} = \frac{(0.001028) \times (0.1233)^2}{1 - 0.1233} = \frac{0.001028 \times 0.01520}{0.8767} = \frac{1.563 \times 10^{-5}}{0.8767} \approx 1.78 \times 10^{-5}$.
The dissociation constant of acetic acid is approximately $1.78 \times 10^{-5}$ mol L$^{-1}$. (Textbook answer $1.78 \times 10^{-5}$ mol L$^{-1}$).
Intext Questions
3.7 Why does the conductivity of a solution decrease with dilution?
3.8 Suggest a way to determine the $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ value of water.
3.9 The molar conductivity of 0.025 mol L$^{-1}$ methanoic acid is 46.1 S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$. Calculate its degree of dissociation and dissociation constant. Given $\lambda^0$(H$^{+}$) = 349.6 S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$ and $\lambda^0$ (HCOO$^{-}$) = 54.6 S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$.
Answer:
3.7 Conductivity ($\kappa$) is defined as the conductance of a unit volume of the solution. On dilution, the volume of the solution increases while the total number of ions remains the same (for a strong electrolyte) or increases slightly (for a weak electrolyte due to increased dissociation). However, the number of ions present per unit volume of the solution decreases on dilution. Since conductivity is proportional to the number of charge carriers (ions) per unit volume, the conductivity of the solution decreases with dilution.
3.8 Water is a very weak electrolyte, dissociating as H$_2$O $\rightleftharpoons$ H$^{+}$ + OH$^{-}$. To determine the limiting molar conductivity ($\Lambda^0_\text{m}$) of water, we can use Kohlrausch's Law of independent migration of ions.
$\Lambda^0_\text{m}$(H$_2$O) = $\lambda^0_{\text{H}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{OH}^{-}}$.
Since water itself is a weak electrolyte, we cannot directly extrapolate its $\Lambda_\text{m}$ vs c$^{1/2}$ plot to zero concentration. However, we can obtain $\lambda^0_{\text{H}^{+}}$ and $\lambda^0_{\text{OH}^{-}}$ from the limiting molar conductivities of strong electrolytes that contain these ions. For example, we can use the $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ values of a strong acid, a strong base, and their corresponding salt.
For example, using HCl, NaOH, and NaCl:
$\Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{HCl}) = \lambda^0_{\text{H}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{Cl}^{-}}$
$\Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{NaOH}) = \lambda^0_{\text{Na}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{OH}^{-}}$
$\Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{NaCl}) = \lambda^0_{\text{Na}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{Cl}^{-}}$
Adding the first two and subtracting the third gives:
($\lambda^0_{\text{H}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{Cl}^{-}}$) + ($\lambda^0_{\text{Na}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{OH}^{-}}$) - ($\lambda^0_{\text{Na}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{Cl}^{-}}$) = $\lambda^0_{\text{H}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{OH}^{-}} = \Lambda^0_\text{m}$(H$_2$O).
So, $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$(H$_2$O) = $\Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{HCl}) + \Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{NaOH}) - \Lambda^0_\text{m}(\textsf{NaCl})$.
We can measure the $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ values of these strong electrolytes by extrapolation of their $\Lambda_\text{m}$ vs c$^{1/2}$ plots to zero concentration, and then use these values to calculate $\Lambda^0_\text{m}$ for water.
3.9 Concentration, c = 0.025 mol L$^{-1}$.
Molar conductivity at this concentration, $\Lambda_\text{m}$(c) = 46.1 S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$.
Methanoic acid (HCOOH) is a weak acid. Its limiting molar conductivity ($\Lambda^0_\text{m}$) can be calculated using Kohlrausch's Law and the given limiting ionic conductivities:
$\Lambda^0_\text{m}$(HCOOH) = $\lambda^0_{\text{H}^{+}} + \lambda^0_{\text{HCOO}^{-}} = 349.6 \text{ S cm}^2 \text{ mol}^{-1} + 54.6 \text{ S cm}^2 \text{ mol}^{-1} = 404.2$ S cm$^2$ mol$^{-1}$.
Degree of dissociation ($\alpha$) = $\frac{\Lambda_\text{m}(\text{c})}{\Lambda^0_\text{m}}$.
$\alpha = \frac{46.1 \text{ S cm}^2 \text{ mol}^{-1}}{404.2 \text{ S cm}^2 \text{ mol}^{-1}} \approx 0.114$. (Textbook answer 0.114).
Dissociation constant ($\textsf{K}_\text{a}$) for a weak acid HCOOH $\rightleftharpoons$ H$^+$ + HCOO$^{-}$.
Initial (M): c 0 0
Equilibrium (M): c(1-$\alpha$) c$\alpha$ c$\alpha$
$\textsf{K}_\text{a} = \frac{[\textsf{H}^+][\textsf{HCOO}^{-}]}{[\textsf{HCOOH}]} = \frac{(\textsf{c}\alpha)(\textsf{c}\alpha)}{\textsf{c}(1-\alpha)} = \frac{\textsf{c}\alpha^2}{1-\alpha}$.
Substitute values: c = 0.025 mol L$^{-1}$, $\alpha = 0.114$.
$\textsf{K}_\text{a} = \frac{(0.025) \times (0.114)^2}{1 - 0.114} = \frac{0.025 \times 0.012996}{0.886} = \frac{3.249 \times 10^{-4}}{0.886} \approx 3.667 \times 10^{-4}$.
The dissociation constant is approximately $3.67 \times 10^{-4}$ mol L$^{-1}$. (Textbook answer 3.67 $\times$ 10$^{-4}$ mol L$^{-1}$).
Electrolytic Cells And Electrolysis
An electrolytic cell uses an external voltage source to drive a non-spontaneous chemical reaction. It converts electrical energy into chemical energy. Electrolysis is used for chemical synthesis and production of elements (e.g., Na, Mg, Al from fused salts) where chemical reduction is difficult.
Example: Electrolysis of aqueous copper sulfate ($\textsf{CuSO}_4$) with copper strips (reactive electrodes).
- At the cathode (negative electrode), $\textsf{Cu}^{2+}$ ions from the solution are reduced: $\textsf{Cu}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 2\textsf{e}^{-} \to \textsf{Cu(s)}$. Copper metal deposits on the cathode.
- At the anode (positive electrode), copper metal from the electrode is oxidised: $\textsf{Cu(s)} \to \textsf{Cu}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 2\textsf{e}^{-}$. Copper dissolves from the anode.
This process is used to purify impure copper: impure copper is the anode, pure copper is the cathode.
Electrolysis of molten $\textsf{NaCl}$ yields $\textsf{Na}$ metal (at cathode) and $\textsf{Cl}_2$ gas (at anode). Electrolysis of aqueous $\textsf{NaCl}$ yields $\textsf{NaOH}$, $\textsf{H}_2$ gas (at cathode), and $\textsf{Cl}_2$ gas (at anode).
Quantitative Aspects Of Electrolysis
Michael Faraday formulated two laws describing the quantitative relationships in electrolysis (amount of substance produced/consumed and quantity of electricity passed).
- Faraday's First Law: The mass of a substance deposited or liberated at any electrode during electrolysis is directly proportional to the quantity of electricity (charge) passed through the electrolyte. Mass $\propto$ Charge (Q).
- Faraday's Second Law: The masses of different substances liberated by the same quantity of electricity passing through different electrolytic solutions connected in series are proportional to their chemical equivalent weights (equivalent weight = Molar mass / Number of electrons involved in the half-reaction).
Quantity of electricity (Q) passed is the product of current (I) and time (t): $\textsf{Q} = \textsf{It}$ (Q in Coulombs (C), I in Amperes (A), t in seconds (s)).
One Faraday (F) is the charge on one mole of electrons ($1 \text{ mol e}^{-}$). $1 \text{ F} = 96487 \text{ C mol}^{-1} \approx 96500 \text{ C mol}^{-1}$.
The charge required for electrolysis depends on the number of electrons in the half-reaction. For $\textsf{Ag}^{+} + \textsf{e}^{-} \to \textsf{Ag(s)}$, 1 mol $\textsf{e}^{-}$ (1F) is needed per mole of $\textsf{Ag}$. For $\textsf{Mg}^{2+} + 2\textsf{e}^{-} \to \textsf{Mg(s)}$, 2 mol $\textsf{e}^{-}$ (2F) are needed per mole of $\textsf{Mg}$.
Example 3.10 A solution of $\textsf{CuSO}_4$ is electrolysed for 10 minutes with a current of 1.5 amperes. What is the mass of copper deposited at the cathode?
Answer:
Time, t = 10 minutes = 10 $\times$ 60 = 600 seconds.
Current, I = 1.5 amperes.
Quantity of electricity passed, Q = I $\times$ t = 1.5 A $\times$ 600 s = 900 C.
At the cathode, the reaction is reduction of $\textsf{Cu}^{2+}$ ions:
$\textsf{Cu}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 2\textsf{e}^{-} \to \textsf{Cu(s)}$
This reaction shows that 2 moles of electrons are required to deposit 1 mole of copper metal.
Charge of 2 moles of electrons = 2 $\times$ Faraday constant = 2 $\times$ 96487 C = 192974 C.
Molar mass of copper (Cu) = 63.55 g/mol.
So, 192974 C of charge deposits 63.55 g of Cu.
We passed 900 C of charge. Mass of Cu deposited = $\frac{\text{Mass of 1 mole Cu}}{\text{Charge of 2 moles e}^-} \times \text{Total charge passed}$
Mass of Cu = $\frac{63.55 \text{ g}}{192974 \text{ C}} \times 900 \text{ C} \approx 0.2959$ g.
The mass of copper deposited at the cathode is approximately 0.296 g. (Textbook answer 0.2938 g - slight difference due to molar mass of Cu or Faraday constant value used).
Products Of Electrolysis
The products formed during electrolysis depend on several factors:
- Nature of the substance being electrolysed (molten salt vs aqueous solution).
- Type of electrodes (inert vs reactive).
- Relative standard electrode potentials of the competing reactions at each electrode.
- Overpotential (extra voltage needed for some reactions to occur at a reasonable rate).
In an aqueous solution, besides the ions from the electrolyte, water molecules are also present and can be oxidised or reduced. Competing reactions occur at cathode (reduction) and anode (oxidation).
Example: Electrolysis of aqueous $\textsf{NaCl}$ solution with inert electrodes (Pt):
- At cathode (reduction): Competition between $\textsf{Na}^{+}$ reduction and $\textsf{H}_2\textsf{O}$ reduction ($\textsf{H}^{+}$ reduction). $\textsf{H}^{+}$/$\textsf{H}_2$ couple has a higher reduction potential (0.00 V) than $\textsf{Na}^{+}$/$\textsf{Na}$ (-2.71 V). So, $\textsf{H}^{+}$ is preferentially reduced: $2\textsf{H}^{+}\text{(aq)} + 2\textsf{e}^{-} \to \textsf{H}_2\text{(g)}$. Since $\textsf{H}^{+}$ is supplied by water dissociation, net cathode reaction is $2\textsf{H}_2\textsf{O(l)} + 2\textsf{e}^{-} \to \textsf{H}_2\textsf{(g)} + 2\textsf{OH}^{-}\text{(aq)}$. Product: $\textsf{H}_2$ gas.
- At anode (oxidation): Competition between $\textsf{Cl}^{-}$ oxidation and $\textsf{H}_2\textsf{O}$ oxidation. $\textsf{Cl}^{-}$/$\textsf{Cl}_2$ has $\textsf{E}^0 = +1.36$ V. $\textsf{H}_2\textsf{O}$/$\textsf{O}_2$ has $\textsf{E}^0 = +1.23$ V. Thermodynamically, water oxidation should be preferred. However, due to overpotential for oxygen formation, $\textsf{Cl}^{-}$ oxidation is often preferred, especially at higher concentrations of $\textsf{Cl}^{-}$: $2\textsf{Cl}^{-}\text{(aq)} \to \textsf{Cl}_2\text{(g)} + 2\textsf{e}^{-}$. Product: $\textsf{Cl}_2$ gas.
Net reaction for aqueous $\textsf{NaCl}$ electrolysis: $2\textsf{NaCl(aq)} + 2\textsf{H}_2\textsf{O(l)} \to 2\textsf{NaOH(aq)} + \textsf{H}_2\textsf{(g)} + \textsf{Cl}_2\text{(g)}$.
Products: $\textsf{NaOH}$ (in solution), $\textsf{H}_2$ gas, $\textsf{Cl}_2$ gas.
For concentrated sulphuric acid electrolysis, at the anode, $\textsf{S}_2\textsf{O}_8^{2-}$ is formed instead of $\textsf{O}_2$ due to overpotential.
Intext Questions
3.10 If a current of 0.5 ampere flows through a metallic wire for 2 hours, then how many electrons would flow through the wire?
3.11 Suggest a list of metals that are extracted electrolytically.
3.12 Consider the reaction: Cr$_2$O$_7^{2-}$ + 14H$^{+}$ + 6e$^-$ $\to$ 2Cr$^{3+}$ + 7H$_2$O. What is the quantity of electricity in coulombs needed to reduce 1 mol of Cr$_2$O$_7^{2-}$?
Answer:
3.10 Current, I = 0.5 ampere.
Time, t = 2 hours = 2 $\times$ 60 minutes/hour $\times$ 60 seconds/minute = 7200 seconds.
Quantity of charge, Q = I $\times$ t = 0.5 A $\times$ 7200 s = 3600 C.
Charge of one electron = $1.602 \times 10^{-19}$ C.
Number of electrons = $\frac{\text{Total charge}}{\text{Charge per electron}} = \frac{3600 \text{ C}}{1.602 \times 10^{-19} \text{ C/electron}} \approx 2.247 \times 10^{22}$ electrons.
The number of electrons that would flow through the wire is approximately $2.25 \times 10^{22}$ electrons.
3.11 Metals that are highly reactive (strong reducing agents) and cannot be easily reduced by chemical methods are typically extracted electrolytically from their fused salts or solutions. Examples include alkali metals, alkaline earth metals, and aluminum.
List of metals extracted electrolytically: Sodium (Na), Potassium (K), Calcium (Ca), Magnesium (Mg), Aluminium (Al), Lithium (Li).
3.12 The reaction is: Cr$_2$O$_7^{2-}$ + 14H$^{+}$ + 6e$^-$ $\to$ 2Cr$^{3+}$ + 7H$_2$O.
To reduce 1 mole of Cr$_2$O$_7^{2-}$ ions, 6 moles of electrons are required according to the stoichiometry of the reaction.
The quantity of electricity needed is the charge of 6 moles of electrons.
Charge of 1 mole of electrons = 1 Faraday (F) = 96487 C.
Quantity of electricity = 6 moles $\times$ 1 F/mole = 6 F.
In coulombs, Quantity of electricity = 6 $\times$ 96487 C = 578922 C.
The quantity of electricity needed is 578922 C or 6 Faraday.
Batteries
A battery (often multiple cells in series) is a source of electrical energy based on galvanic cells. Desirable battery characteristics include being light, compact, and having stable voltage during discharge. Batteries are classified into primary and secondary types.
Primary Batteries
In primary batteries, the electrochemical reaction occurs only once. They are non-rechargeable and become dead after use.
- Dry cell (Leclanché cell): Common in transistors, clocks. Anode: Zinc container. Cathode: Carbon (graphite) rod surrounded by $\textsf{MnO}_2$ and carbon powder. Electrolyte: Moist paste of $\textsf{NH}_4\text{Cl}$ and $\textsf{ZnCl}_2$. Potential $\approx$ 1.5 V.
- Mercury cell: For low-current devices (hearing aids, watches). Anode: Zinc-mercury amalgam. Cathode: Paste of HgO and carbon. Electrolyte: Paste of KOH and ZnO. Potential $\approx$ 1.35 V, stable during life as overall reaction doesn't involve concentration changes of dissolved ions.
Secondary Batteries
Secondary batteries are rechargeable. After discharge, current can be passed in the reverse direction to regenerate the reactants, allowing reuse for many cycles.
- Lead storage battery: Common in automobiles, inverters. Anode: Lead. Cathode: Grid of lead packed with $\textsf{PbO}_2$. Electrolyte: 38% $\textsf{H}_2\textsf{SO}_4$ solution.
- Nickel-cadmium cell: Rechargeable, longer life than lead storage but more expensive.
Intext Questions
3.13 Write the chemistry of recharging the lead storage battery, highlighting all the materials that are involved during recharging.
3.14 Suggest two materials other than hydrogen that can be used as fuels in fuel cells.
Answer:
3.13 During the discharging of a lead storage battery, the reactions are:
Anode: Pb(s) + SO$_4^{2-}$(aq) $\to$ PbSO$_4$(s) + 2e$^-$
Cathode: PbO$_2$(s) + SO$_4^{2-}$(aq) + 4H$^{+}$(aq) + 2e$^-$ $\to$ PbSO$_4$(s) + 2H$_2$O(l)
Overall discharge reaction: Pb(s) + PbO$_2$(s) + 2H$_2$SO$_4$(aq) $\to$ 2PbSO$_4$(s) + 2H$_2$O(l)
During recharging, an external voltage is applied, and the current flows in the opposite direction, reversing the cell reactions. The reactions are:
At the electrode which was the anode during discharge (now acts as cathode during charging): PbSO$_4$(s) + 2e$^-$ $\to$ Pb(s) + SO$_4^{2-}$(aq)
At the electrode which was the cathode during discharge (now acts as anode during charging): PbSO$_4$(s) + 2H$_2$O(l) $\to$ PbO$_2$(s) + SO$_4^{2-}$(aq) + 4H$^{+}$(aq) + 2e$^-$
Overall charging reaction: 2PbSO$_4$(s) + 2H$_2$O(l) $\to$ Pb(s) + PbO$_2$(s) + 2H$_2$SO$_4$(aq)
Materials involved during recharging:
- Lead sulfate (PbSO$_4$), which was formed and deposited on both electrodes during discharge, is consumed.
- Water (H$_2$O), which was produced during discharge and dilutes the sulfuric acid, is consumed.
- Lead (Pb) is reformed at the negative plate (former anode).
- Lead dioxide (PbO$_2$) is reformed at the positive plate (former cathode).
- Sulfuric acid (H$_2$SO$_4$) is regenerated, and its concentration increases.
3.14 Fuel cells convert the chemical energy of fuels directly into electrical energy with high efficiency. Other materials that can be used as fuels in fuel cells besides hydrogen include:
- Methane ($\textsf{CH}_4$): Can be oxidised at the anode.
- Methanol ($\textsf{CH}_3\text{OH}$): Can be oxidised at the anode.
Fuel Cells
Fuel cells are galvanic cells designed to convert the energy of combustion of fuels (like $\textsf{H}_2$, $\textsf{CH}_4$, $\textsf{CH}_3\text{OH}$) directly into electrical energy. They are highly efficient compared to thermal power plants.
Reactants are fed continuously to the electrodes, and products are removed. One common fuel cell uses $\textsf{H}_2$ and $\textsf{O}_2$ reactants, producing water.
In a typical $\textsf{H}_2$-$\textsf{O}_2$ fuel cell:
- $\textsf{H}_2$ and $\textsf{O}_2$ are bubbled through porous carbon electrodes.
- Electrolyte is often concentrated aqueous $\textsf{NaOH}$ solution.
- Catalysts (finely divided Pt or Pd) are incorporated into electrodes.
Electrode reactions:
- Cathode: $\textsf{O}_2\text{(g)} + 2\textsf{H}_2\textsf{O(l)} + 4\textsf{e}^{-} \to 4\textsf{OH}^{-}\text{(aq)}$
- Anode: $2\textsf{H}_2\text{(g)} + 4\textsf{OH}^{-}\text{(aq)} \to 4\textsf{H}_2\textsf{O(l)} + 4\textsf{e}^{-}$
Overall reaction: $2\textsf{H}_2\text{(g)} + \textsf{O}_2\text{(g)} \to 2\textsf{H}_2\textsf{O(l)}$.
The cell operates continuously as long as fuel ($\textsf{H}_2$) and oxidant ($\textsf{O}_2$) are supplied. Efficiency is high ($\sim 70\%$). Fuel cells are pollution-free (produce water). They are being explored for vehicles and other applications, driving research into better electrode materials and catalysts.
Intext Question
3.14 Suggest two materials other than hydrogen that can be used as fuels in fuel cells.
Answer:
Two materials other than hydrogen that can be used as fuels in fuel cells are methane ($\textsf{CH}_4$) and methanol ($\textsf{CH}_3\text{OH}$). These are typically oxidised at the anode to produce $\textsf{CO}_2$ and water, releasing electrons.
Corrosion
Corrosion is the slow degradation of metallic surfaces due to reaction with their environment, typically forming oxides or other salts. Examples: rusting of iron, tarnishing of silver, green coating on copper/bronze. Corrosion causes significant economic damage to structures and objects made of metal, especially iron.
Corrosion is essentially an electrochemical process.
Rusting of iron:
- At certain spots on the iron surface, oxidation occurs: $\textsf{Fe(s)} \to \textsf{Fe}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 2\textsf{e}^{-}$. This spot acts as the anode.
- Electrons move through the metal to another spot, which acts as the cathode. Here, oxygen is reduced in the presence of $\textsf{H}^{+}$ ions (from $\textsf{H}_2\textsf{CO}_3$ formed from $\textsf{CO}_2$ in water or from acidic oxides in the atmosphere): $\textsf{O}_2\text{(g)} + 4\textsf{H}^{+}\text{(aq)} + 4\textsf{e}^{-} \to 2\textsf{H}_2\textsf{O(l)}$.
Overall electrochemical reaction: $2\textsf{Fe(s)} + \textsf{O}_2\text{(g)} + 4\textsf{H}^{+}\text{(aq)} \to 2\textsf{Fe}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 2\textsf{H}_2\textsf{O(l)}$.
The $\textsf{Fe}^{2+}$ ions are further oxidised by atmospheric oxygen to $\textsf{Fe}^{3+}$ ions, forming rust (hydrated ferric oxide, $\textsf{Fe}_2\textsf{O}_3$.x$\textsf{H}_2\textsf{O}$).
Prevention of corrosion is crucial for safety and economic reasons.
Methods to prevent corrosion:
- Preventing the metal surface from contacting the atmosphere (e.g., painting, coating with chemicals like bisphenol).
- Covering the surface with other metals:
- Using an inert metal coating (e.g., tin plating) - provides barrier protection.
- Using a more reactive metal coating (e.g., zinc coating in galvanisation) - the more reactive metal corrodes preferentially, protecting the underlying metal. This is sacrificial protection.
- Electrochemical methods: Providing a sacrificial electrode of a more reactive metal (like Mg or Zn) connected to the object to be protected. The sacrificial electrode corrodes instead of the object.
Intext Question
3.15 Explain how rusting of iron is envisaged as setting up of an electrochemical cell.
Answer:
Rusting of iron is considered an electrochemical process because it involves the transfer of electrons in spatially separated regions on the surface of the iron object, effectively setting up tiny galvanic cells.
On the surface of the iron, there are usually differences in oxygen concentration or surface defects, creating anodic and cathodic areas. This acts like a galvanic cell:
- Anode: At specific spots (often where the iron surface is stressed or has low oxygen), oxidation occurs. Iron metal is oxidised to $\textsf{Fe}^{2+}$ ions, releasing electrons.
$\textsf{Fe(s)} \to \textsf{Fe}^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 2\textsf{e}^{-}$ - Cathode: Electrons released at the anode travel through the iron metal to other spots on the surface (typically areas with higher oxygen concentration, or impurities acting as electron conductors). Here, oxygen is reduced in the presence of water and hydrogen ions (H$^+$ ions are formed from the dissolution of acidic gases like CO$_2$ in atmospheric moisture).
$\textsf{O}_2\text{(g)} + 4\textsf{H}^{+}\text{(aq)} + 4\textsf{e}^{-} \to 2\textsf{H}_2\textsf{O(l)}$
The $\textsf{Fe}^{2+}$ ions formed at the anode then diffuse away through the water film and are further oxidised by atmospheric oxygen to $\textsf{Fe}^{3+}$ ions, which precipitate as hydrated ferric oxide, Fe$_2$O$_3$.xH$_2$O (rust). The flow of ions in the water film on the surface (electrolyte) and the flow of electrons through the iron metal completes the circuit of this electrochemical cell, driving the corrosion process.
Intext Questions
Question 3.1. How would you determine the standard electrode potential of the system $Mg^{2+}|Mg$?
Answer:
Question 3.2. Can you store copper sulphate solutions in a zinc pot?
Answer:
Question 3.3. Consult the table of standard electrode potentials and suggest three substances that can oxidise ferrous ions under suitable conditions.
Answer:
Question 3.4. Calculate the potential of hydrogen electrode in contact with a solution whose pH is $10$.
Answer:
Question 3.5. Calculate the emf of the cell in which the following reaction takes place:
$Ni(s) + 2Ag^+ (0.002 \text{ M}) \rightarrow Ni^{2+} (0.160 \text{ M}) + 2Ag(s)$
Given that $E^\ominus_{cell} = 1.05 \text{ V}$
Answer:
Question 3.6. The cell in which the following reaction occurs:
$2Fe^{3+}(aq) + 2I^{-}(aq) \rightarrow 2Fe^{2+}(aq) + I_2(s)$
has $E^\circ_{cell} = 0.236 \text{ V}$ at $298 \text{ K}$.
Calculate the standard Gibbs energy and the equilibrium constant of the cell reaction.
Answer:
Question 3.7. Why does the conductivity of a solution decrease with dilution?
Answer:
Question 3.8. Suggest a way to determine the $\Lambda^\circ_m$ value of water.
Answer:
Question 3.9. The molar conductivity of $0.025 \text{ mol L}^{-1}$ methanoic acid is $46.1 \text{ S cm}^2 \text{ mol}^{-1}$. Calculate its degree of dissociation and dissociation constant. Given $\lambda^\circ(H^+) = 349.6 \text{ S cm}^2 \text{ mol}^{-1}$ and $\lambda^\circ (HCOO^-) = 54.6 \text{ S cm}^2 \text{ mol}^{-1}$.
Answer:
Question 3.10. If a current of $0.5 \text{ ampere}$ flows through a metallic wire for $2 \text{ hours}$, then how many electrons would flow through the wire?
Answer:
Question 3.11. Suggest a list of metals that are extracted electrolytically.
Answer:
Question 3.12. Consider the reaction:
$Cr_2O_7^{2-} + 14H^+ + 6e^- \rightarrow 2Cr^{3+} + 7H_2O$
What is the quantity of electricity in coulombs needed to reduce $1 \text{ mol}$ of $Cr_2O_7^{2-}$?
Answer:
Question 3.13. Write the chemistry of recharging the lead storage battery, highlighting all the materials that are involved during recharging.
Answer:
Question 3.14. Suggest two materials other than hydrogen that can be used as fuels in fuel cells.
Answer:
Question 3.15. Explain how rusting of iron is envisaged as setting up of an electrochemical cell.
Answer:
Exercises
Question 3.1. Arrange the following metals in the order in which they displace each other from the solution of their salts.
$Al, Cu, Fe, Mg$ and $Zn$.
Answer:
Question 3.2. Given the standard electrode potentials,
$K^+/K = –2.93 \text{V}$, $Ag^+/Ag = 0.80 \text{V}$,
$Hg^{2+}/Hg = 0.79 \text{V}$
$Mg^{2+}/Mg = –2.37 \text{ V}$, $Cr^{3+}/Cr = – 0.74 \text{V}$
Arrange these metals in their increasing order of reducing power.
Answer:
Question 3.3. Depict the galvanic cell in which the reaction $Zn(s)+2Ag^+(aq) \rightarrow Zn^{2+}(aq)+2Ag(s)$ takes place. Further show:
(i) Which of the electrode is negatively charged?
(ii) The carriers of the current in the cell.
(iii) Individual reaction at each electrode.
Answer:
Question 3.4. Calculate the standard cell potentials of galvanic cell in which the following reactions take place:
(i) $2Cr(s) + 3Cd^{2+}(aq) \rightarrow 2Cr^{3+}(aq) + 3Cd(s)$
(ii) $Fe^{2+}(aq) + Ag^+(aq) \rightarrow Fe^{3+}(aq) + Ag(s)$
Calculate the $\Delta_rG^\circ$ and equilibrium constant of the reactions.
Answer:
Question 3.5. Write the Nernst equation and emf of the following cells at $298 \text{ K}$:
(i) $Mg(s)|Mg^{2+}(0.001M)||Cu^{2+}(0.0001 M)|Cu(s)$
(ii) $Fe(s)|Fe^{2+}(0.001M)||H^+(1M)|H_2(g)(1bar)| Pt(s)$
(iii) $Sn(s)|Sn^{2+}(0.050 M)||H^+(0.020 M)|H_2(g) (1 bar)|Pt(s)$
(iv) $Pt(s)|Br^–(0.010 M)|Br_2(l )||H^+(0.030 M)| H_2(g) (1 bar)|Pt(s)$.
Answer:
Question 3.6. In the button cells widely used in watches and other devices the following reaction takes place:
$Zn(s) + Ag_2O(s) + H_2O(l ) \rightarrow Zn^{2+}(aq) + 2Ag(s) + 2OH^–(aq)$
Determine $\Delta_rG^\ominus$ and $E^\ominus$ for the reaction.
Answer:
Question 3.7. Define conductivity and molar conductivity for the solution of an electrolyte. Discuss their variation with concentration.
Answer:
Question 3.8. The conductivity of $0.20 \text{ M}$ solution of $KCl$ at $298 \text{ K}$ is $0.0248 \text{ S cm}^{-1}$. Calculate its molar conductivity.
Answer:
Question 3.9. The resistance of a conductivity cell containing $0.001M \text{ KCl}$ solution at $298 \text{ K}$ is $1500 \Omega$. What is the cell constant if conductivity of $0.001M \text{ KCl}$ solution at $298 \text{ K}$ is $0.146 \times 10^{-3} \text{ S cm}^{-1}$.
Answer:
Question 3.10. The conductivity of sodium chloride at $298 \text{ K}$ has been determined at different concentrations and the results are given below:
| Concentration/M | $0.001$ | $0.010$ | $0.020$ | $0.050$ | $0.100$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $10^2 \times \kappa / \text{S m}^{-1}$ | $1.237$ | $11.85$ | $23.15$ | $55.53$ | $106.74$ |
Calculate $\Lambda_m$ for all concentrations and draw a plot between $\Lambda_m$ and $c^{1/2}$. Find the value of $\Lambda_m^\circ$.
Answer:
Question 3.11. Conductivity of $0.00241 \text{ M}$ acetic acid is $7.896 \times 10^{-5} \text{ S cm}^{-1}$. Calculate its molar conductivity. If $\Lambda_m^\circ$ for acetic acid is $390.5 \text{ S cm}^2 \text{ mol}^{-1}$, what is its dissociation constant?
Answer:
Question 3.12. How much charge is required for the following reductions:
(i) $1 \text{ mol}$ of $Al^{3+}$ to $Al$?
(ii) $1 \text{ mol}$ of $Cu^{2+}$ to $Cu$?
(iii) $1 \text{ mol}$ of $MnO_4^{–}$ to $Mn^{2+}$?
Answer:
Question 3.13. How much electricity in terms of Faraday is required to produce
(i) $20.0 \text{ g}$ of $Ca$ from molten $CaCl_2$?
(ii) $40.0 \text{ g}$ of $Al$ from molten $Al_2O_3$?
Answer:
Question 3.14. How much electricity is required in coulomb for the oxidation of
(i) $1 \text{ mol}$ of $H_2O$ to $O_2$?
(ii) $1 \text{ mol}$ of $FeO$ to $Fe_2O_3$?
Answer:
Question 3.15. A solution of $Ni(NO_3)_2$ is electrolysed between platinum electrodes using a current of $5 \text{ amperes}$ for $20 \text{ minutes}$. What mass of $Ni$ is deposited at the cathode?
Answer:
Question 3.16. Three electrolytic cells A, B, C containing solutions of $ZnSO_4, AgNO_3$ and $CuSO_4$, respectively are connected in series. A steady current of $1.5 \text{ amperes}$ was passed through them until $1.45 \text{ g}$ of silver deposited at the cathode of cell B. How long did the current flow? What mass of copper and zinc were deposited?
Answer:
Question 3.17. Using the standard electrode potentials given in Table 3.1, predict if the reaction between the following is feasible:
(i) $Fe^{3+}(aq)$ and $I^–(aq)$
(ii) $Ag^+ (aq)$ and $Cu(s)$
(iii) $Fe^{3+} (aq)$ and $Br^– (aq)$
(iv) $Ag(s)$ and $Fe^{3+} (aq)$
(v) $Br_2 (aq)$ and $Fe^{2+} (aq)$.
Answer:
Question 3.18. Predict the products of electrolysis in each of the following:
(i) An aqueous solution of $AgNO_3$ with silver electrodes.
(ii) An aqueous solution of $AgNO_3$ with platinum electrodes.
(iii) A dilute solution of $H_2SO_4$ with platinum electrodes.
(iv) An aqueous solution of $CuCl_2$ with platinum electrodes.
Answer: